So, the steps then would be the same? I mean, 1. make menuconfig 2. make-kpkg clean 3. make-kpkg kernel_image?
Or is it necesary to do make-kpkg kernel_source, with subsequent dpkg -i kernel_source.deb? looping then back to number 1. above? Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > > Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of > > questions: > > 1. How long it usually takes before we have a kernel-source? > > 2. Can we use make-kpkg (kernel package) with the linux-2.4.0.tar.gz > > (after unpacking, of course)? If so, what would the procedure be? > > yes kernel-package works fine with 2.4.0. you use it the same way as > 2.2. > > the only (minor) problem is when you remove a make-kpkg kernel image > /lib/modules/`uname -r` is not totally removed since the generated > .deb does not know about some of the extra .dep files created there. > this is with potato's make-kpkg, this might be fixed in later > versions. > > -- > Ethan Benson > http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
