Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:02:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300951: fixed in hevea 1.07-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 278126 sarge
Bug#278126: silo: missing build-depnds on sparcutils
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
tags 278126 sarge
thanks
This bug has been fixed in the upload of silo 1.4.9-1 to unstable, although
the bug report was not closed due to a syntax error in the changelog file.
The bug still affects sarge, and will do so until silo is manually pushed
in by the release team, due to the base freeze;
Hi James,
Given that this bug is marked "grave", should gnupg 1.4.0-3 be pushed into
testing, or is there another fix we should prefer here?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Torsten,
It seems that because of this and several other bugs that are not easily
resolvable in the sarge time frame, as well as pressure from upstream, we
are going to be backing out PHP's ZTS support in the next day or so; at
which point this bug will be a non-issue for us.
Cheers,
--
Steve
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:32:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291600: fixed in gibraltar-bootcd 0.50
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 294499 normal
Bug#294499: php4 wrappers broken for thread-safe php
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297861 patch
Bug#297861: Kopete crashes on incoming icq message from icq5 user
Tags were: security
Bug#295265: kopete: Crashes with new ICQ-version
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:40:23 -0800, Steve Langasek said:
> Given that this bug is marked "grave", should gnupg 1.4.0-3 be pushed into
> testing, or is there another fix we should prefer here?
Although I'd prefer to see 1.4.1 in testing, updating to 1.2.7 would
solve this bug.
Shalom-Salam,
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:47:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It seems that because of this and several other bugs that are not easily
> resolvable in the sarge time frame, as well as pressure from upstream, we
> are going to be backing out PHP's ZTS support in the next day or so; a
Package: gaim-encryption
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'gaim-encryption' in a clean chroot,
I get the following error:
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\${prefix}/share/info \
--with-nss-includes=/usr/include/mozilla/nss \
Hi Roland,
Thanks for your report. Which runtime did you use to try to build? The
transcript points to kaffe, but the reports says:
> pn kaffe | java-virtual-machine Not found.
which seems to imply that kaffe is not installed. Version numbers would be
useful too.
In any case, I am a
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading to 1.1.23-7, CUPS is not more usable.
I had a working local raw printer, called "samsung", with 4 pending jobs, and
it stopped working. "lpadmin -p samsung" give the error
"client-error-not-
tags 297861 patch
thanks
- Forwarded message -
Subject: #99535
Date: Monday, 21. March 2005 13:15
From: Will Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Molkentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch disables Kopete from handling RTF format messages in ICQ,
preventing the bug in the RTF parser f
Thomas Hood wrote:
Hi,
This RC bug was assigned to mdadm over a month ago and there has been no
comment from the maintainer. What is the status of this bug?
unfortunately I'm very busy in real life currently. An other problem is
that I do not use udev. Therefore any help is welcome.
Cheers, Mari
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:17:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300600: fixed in xsupplicant 1.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301012 important
Bug#301012: Error: client-error-not-authorized when adding a printer
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 299875 -1
Bug#299875: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Bug 299875 cloned as bug 301018.
> reassign -1 ppp
Bug#301018: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `ppp'.
> retitle -1 ppp_2.
retitle 301014 gaim-encryption: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'autotools-dev'
and 'libgtk2.0-dev'
thanks
My previous report was incomplete, sorry. Besides 'autotools-dev',
there is also 'libgtk2.0-dev' missing from the Build-Depends.
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'autotools-dev' and
clone 299875 -1
reassign -1 ppp
retitle -1 ppp_2.4.3 pppd hangs on re-connect
tags -1 - patch
tags -1 - security
severity -1 important
thanks
The security issue does not seem relevant to this bug, according to
the submitter. Hence reassign to ppp, where downgrading "solves" the
issue.
This might
severity 301012 important
thanks
At Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:22:43 +0100,
Mauro Mazzieri wrote:
> Package: cupsys
> Version: 1.1.23-7
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrading to 1.1.23-7, CUPS is not more usable.
> I had a working local raw printer, called "samsu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 292957 pending
Bug#292957: swat(8): duplicated entry in manual
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 274969 pending
Bug#274969: smbd consumes available CPU cycles
Tags were: patch
Bug#286818: /var/run/samba/messages.tdb growing up ind
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300938 + fixed
Bug#300938: siproxd: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): too few arguments to function
'osip_message_parse'
Tags were: sid pending patch
Bug#300684: siproxd_1:0.5.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping proce
Some further notes about util-vserver's failure to build from source:
* dietlibc-dev on hppa fails to define O_FOLLOW and O_LARGEFILE. Adding
these to CFLAGS allows util-vserver to build until it fails to link,
because the linking looks for /usr/lib/diet/lib-hppa instead
of /usr/lib/diet/lib-paris
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:47:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301014: fixed in gaim-encryption 2.36-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: imagefs
Version: 1.03-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
imagefs fails to open the image, either when opening an
existing one or creating a new one:
macvin:~% imagefs c prout 2880
Create new image file [prout] with [2880] sectors.
Fatal: could not create file prou
Package: lsh-server
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The path of the binary lsh-execuv points to a place where lsh-server probably
has been build.
--- snip ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lshd --port 22 --login-shell /bin/bash
lshd: publickey authentication for u
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:02:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300940: fixed in stk 4.2.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:17:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300497: fixed in bsh 1.3.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: mod-proxy-html
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> +#include
> +
This fix is incorrect, I'm going to upload a new package with the right
fix (use ap_* declarations for regexp).
A ll of this is caused by a change in th
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:02:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297912: fixed in mod-proxy-html 2.4.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: bison
Version: 1.875d-1
Severity: serious
Synopsis: installation of bison does not properly install the yacc
alternatives symlinks - see below.
> I think I ran into this a few months back. It had to do with
> alternatives -- very odd.
Odd indeed. I found a stale yacc alternatives file
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:24 +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> Thanks for your report. Which runtime did you use to try to build? The
> transcript points to kaffe, but the reports says:
> > pn kaffe | java-virtual-machine Not found.
> which seems to imply that kaffe is not installed
Package: backuppc
Version: 2.1.0-10
Severity: serious
In postinst, you modify /etc/backuppc/config.pl which is a conffile.
http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt:
3. Configuration files
Packages must not modify their own or other packages conffiles
programmatically. (The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301029 serious
Bug#301029: cdebootstrap: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): format '%d' expects type
'int', but argument 4 has type 'ssize_t'
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Package: gaim-encryption
Severity: serious
Hi
Oh well, I shouldnt have let it pass through NEW, I should have rejected
it. But now lets correct that mistake with a RC bug.
The thing is: gaim-encryption links with OpenSSL. gaim-encryption is
GPL, so it needs a license exemption to actually be all
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:32:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297619: fixed in mozilla 2:1.7.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:32:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294274: fixed in mozilla 2:1.7.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 301080 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301080: gaim-encryption: Links against OpenSSL without license exception
stuff
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Hi,
A couple of news of interest:
Firstly, gaim-encryption has finally been uploaded to Debian's unstable
branch. It's now instalable by all Debian users, there's no more need
for my personal repository to contain Gaim-encryption's packages.
This might actually generate a lot of bug reports[1] and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> retitle 301076 backuppc: modifies conffile with script
Bug#301076: backuppc: modified conffile with script
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:48:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299634: fixed in lapack 3.0.2531a-28
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:17:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301029: fixed in cdebootstrap 0.3.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:39:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledging NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:41:09PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I think I ran into this a few months back. It had to do with
> > alternatives -- very odd.
> Odd indeed. I found a stale yacc alternatives file for bison (byacc) on
> kullervo, that might have prevented proper alternatives install
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:02:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299500: fixed in lincvs 1.4.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:02:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299500: fixed in lincvs 1.4.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Wolfgang Kohnen writes:
> Package: mailscanner
> Version: 4.38.10-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fhs
>
> Hello,
>
> with the default configuration, mailscanner uses /tmp as the directory
> holding pid and lock files. Since these dirs are world writeable, this
> is a security concern. It
Package: libgdiplus
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libgdiplus in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
ma
Package: libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir
Version: 1.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
checking for egrep... grep
This bug should probably have its severity reduced, since it is no
longer affecting normal chroot building of sgml2x as far as I can tell.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This had completely slipped my mind.
Sorry for the noise, I received the bug report and forwarded it to you
without giving it the proper attention. I should have remembered this
before.
Anyway, no harm no foul.
Another very small thing that crossed my mind: when compiled with a
diferent Gaim vers
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:23:09PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Wolfgang Kohnen writes:
> > Package: mailscanner
> > Version: 4.38.10-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: fhs
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > with the default configuration, mailscanner uses /tmp as the directory
> > holding pid and
Package: mdbtools
Version: 0.5.99.0.6pre1.0.20041117-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package mdbtools in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
else rm -f ".deps/eggiconlist.Tpo"; exit 1;
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:47:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301076: fixed in backuppc 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Justin Pryzby writes:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:23:09PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Wolfgang Kohnen writes:
> > > Package: mailscanner
> > > Version: 4.38.10-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Justification: fhs
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > with the default configuration, mailscanner uses
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301075 normal
Bug#301075: yacc/bison breakage on kullervo chroot, please reschedule etpan-ng
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
severity 301075 normal
thanks
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:53:03AM -0800, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:41:09PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > I think I ran into this a few months back. It had to do with
> > > alternatives -- very odd.
> > Odd indeed. I found a stale yacc al
Package: kaboodle
Version: 4:3.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I start trying to view an mpeg or something else (like from leech.dk),
kaboodle only starts, but does not play. When I push play-button, it
breaks with a sigsev (KDE-crash-notifier) or so. Under 32bit
Matthias Klose wrote:
please elaborate, why you think that pid files are created in /tmp.
mailscanner-4.39.6/etc$ grep -r /tmp .
./MailScanner.conf:Lockfile Dir = /tmp
please re-read my question. Thanks, Matthias
Sorry, my bug report was not very complete and I was talking about
"de
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:28:13 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No problem to begin with
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:39:16PM +0100, Dirk Salva wrote:
> Package: kaboodle
> Version: 4:3.3.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When I start trying to view an mpeg or something else (like from leech.dk),
> kaboodle only starts, but does not play. When I push pl
I think it's a safe bet:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/faq.html#q3.1
No harm, no foul.
Cheers and thanks again
On Qua, 2005-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10237 March 1977, Leo Antunes wrote:
>
> > About this bug, where is gaim-encryption linked with OpenSSL?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301127 important
Bug#301127: kaboodle dies with "sigsev" or so when trying to play an mpeg
Severity set to `important'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
severity 301127 important
stop
amd64 is not an official architecture at this point, so this is hardly
release critical. It would also be helpful if you updated to the latest
packages (unless amd64 is really out of date, kdelibs and kdemultimedia all
have updates over the versions listed in your
Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package depends on ocaml-base-3.08, but it should simply depend on
ocaml-base. This renders it uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
A
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:47:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300848: fixed in polygen 1.0.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi Roland,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:34:08PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> building the package mdbtools in a clean build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
It would generally be helpful if you would include in these bug reports
information about whether you're building in a sid o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 301141 sid
Bug#301141: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Fails to install because of wrong dependency on
ocaml-base-3.08
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> close 286905
Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#286922: perl-modules: File::Path::r
Package: strace
Version: 4.5.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
strace faild to build from source on the sparc buildd. It appears to
be a bad interaction of dpkg-shlibdeps and fakeroot.
install -p -o root -g root -m 644 strace.1
debian/tmp/usr/share/man/m
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:32:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300628: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:33 pm, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some
> > > package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing
> > > lists last days
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215637: fixed in libmp3hip 0.1.2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#161579: fixed in libmp3hip 0.1.2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi
can you tell which motherboard/proc combination you have ?
For example i had a problem with amd thunderbird on via
motherboard which did not worked with some optimisation used in
firefox and some mozillasuite old releases.
And knowing if you have extensions would be of help too .
Cheers
Alb
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-22
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
xfaces does not work anymore:
$ xfaces
xfaces: error while loading shared libraries: libXaw.so.8: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
3.3-21 works fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unsta
The two bugs specifically hilighted here are not present in the
Debian/Ubuntu PAM source:
- pam_unix locking DoS: Our was patched with the new locking code from PAM
CVS (049_pam_unix_sane_locking)
- pam_wheel getlogin() spoof: Our pam_wheel is patched to not call
getlogin() at all, as it's "consi
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:02:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300510: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird-locale-pt-br 1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301149 sid
Bug#301149: strace: ftbfs [sparc] build fails with fakeroot
Tags were: sid
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297694: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289237: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292618: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292618: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297554: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286593: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297771: fixed in samba 3.0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> reassign 297694 libwvstreams4.0-extras
Bug#297694: SmartLink WinModem no longer works with wvdial 1.54
Warning: Unknown package 'libwvstreams0.4-extras'
Bug reassigned from package `l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reopen 297554
Bug#297554: libwvstreams4.0-extras: failure in initializing USB modem
Bug#297694: SmartLink WinModem no longer works with wvdial 1.54
Bug reopened, originator not change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since I can't upload this NMU package, I post link to it in bug log.
Regards,
ogi
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
| Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>I've prepared NMU for aspell-bn: it's in temporary location
|>http://debian.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/~og
Package: wvstreams
Source: wvstreams
Version: 4.0.2-1
Severity: serious
* Acknowledge NMUs. (Closes: #292618, #297694, #297554, #286593, #289237)
* We now depend on XPLC 0.3.11.
Lovely. After four consecutive NMUs to try to get the last upstream version
into a releasable state, you've jus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301141 + pending
Bug#301141: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Fails to install because of wrong dependency on
ocaml-base-3.08
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301154 sid
Bug#301154: error while loading shared libraries: libXaw.so.8
Tags were: sid
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:38:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CAN-2005-0530 not in 2.4.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Bas Kloet wrote:
> Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
> Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> This package depends on ocaml-base-3.08, but it should simply depend on
> ocaml-base. This renders it uninstallab
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:39:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301141: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Fails to install because of
wrong dependency on ocaml-base-3.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
According to Marcelo Tosatti, this bug is not present in 2.4,
I agree with his analysis though I previously thought
2.4.27 was vulnerable.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/23/140
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
97 matches
Mail list logo
