Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:47:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301014: fixed in gaim-encryption 2.36-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 10:29:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 02:29:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DE36s-0007ns-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:29:10 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1DE36r-00043h-DZ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:29:09 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gaim-encryption: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'autotools-dev'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:29:09 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gaim-encryption
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gaim-encryption' in a clean chroot,
I get the following error:

./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man \
        --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info \
        --with-nss-includes=/usr/include/mozilla/nss \
        --with-nspr-includes=/usr/include/mozilla/nspr \
--with-nspr-libs=/usr/lib \
--with-nss-libs=/usr/lib
configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'autotools-dev'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gaim-encryption-2.36/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/gaim-encryption-2.36/debian/control     2005-03-23 
11:21:33.397504880 +0100
+++ ./debian/control    2005-03-23 11:21:30.478068675 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), libnss-dev, libnspr-dev, gaim-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper, autotools-dev, libnss-dev, libnspr-dev, gaim-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
 
 Package: gaim-encryption

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301014-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 13:53:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 05:53:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DE6IA-00005Z-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:53:02 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DE6Cb-0000LL-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:47:17 -0500
From: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#301014: fixed in gaim-encryption 2.36-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:47:17 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: gaim-encryption
Source-Version: 2.36-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gaim-encryption, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gaim-encryption_2.36-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gaim-encryption/gaim-encryption_2.36-2.diff.gz
gaim-encryption_2.36-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gaim-encryption/gaim-encryption_2.36-2.dsc
gaim-encryption_2.36-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gaim-encryption/gaim-encryption_2.36-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gaim-encryption package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:31:16 -0300
Source: gaim-encryption
Binary: gaim-encryption
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.36-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gaim-encryption - gaim plugin that provides transparent encryption
Closes: 301014
Changes: 
 gaim-encryption (2.36-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * re-compile with new version of Gaim to make the warning go away (while I
     don't come up with a permanent fix)
   * fix build-depends (I don't know how that slipped through)
     (closes: #301014)
Files: 
 a42678cccade6fd0963c09c517289f4c 652 net optional gaim-encryption_2.36-2.dsc
 3cdd26734f59aa53028f058f076473ab 2506 net optional 
gaim-encryption_2.36-2.diff.gz
 b1f05a5afe6fd15c20969a635ba20d07 91708 net optional 
gaim-encryption_2.36-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCQXGMImLTb3rflGYRAnwWAJ9vHVUVHgNY9OA6E+VvNKpxMSE2VwCgv2t5
e5Da4heKnc7HvGAFa8K72h4=
=4ft7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to