On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:02:47 -0200
"Leo \Costela\ Antunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
> Package: amavis-ng
> Version: 0.1.6.9-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> After an upgrade, amavis started spewing a lot
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:03:09 +0100, Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi, I have put together a patch for /usr/share/kernel-package/rules.
> It reverts (and thus probably reopens) the changes of bug #285688.
> With the patch make-kpkg works for me again.
Umm, that is not th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295415 + patch
Bug#295415: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
This is not a bug in this package, but rather a bug in xfree86-common.
See #295175.
lamont: If you have more of these mysterious "X headers can't be found,
even though they should be there" bugs, pre-seed your chroots with
xfree86-common, make sure it's in state "ii", and retry the builds.
... A
tags 294501 sarge sid unreproducible
thanks
Hrm. I can't seem to reproduce this here, no matter how hard I try.
While it does look like an old php4-imap/glibc bug that cropped up long
ago, and has since been squished, I could reproduce that one, I can't
reproduce this one.
Would it be too much
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294501 sarge sid unreproducible
Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, sid, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 293975 important
Bug#293975: mozilla-firefox: vulnerable to IDN spoofing problems
Bug#294439: mozilla-firefox: Phishing vulnerability using IDN
Severity set to `important'.
Martin Orr said:
>
> Could you change configure.in to have AC_PREREQ(2.50) at the top?
That's my planned fix, yes. :)
... Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:17:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294621: fixed in xwhois 0.4.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:17:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292015: fixed in xwhois 0.4.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:17:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292015: fixed in xwhois 0.4.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Severity: serious
Justification: Serious regression from 2.6.8
Tags: patch
As a result of the discussion on switching to 2.6.10 for Sarge, I have
tested 2.6.10 on my Sparc Ultra 10.
Result was that I discovered a serious regression for the atyfb (Mach64)
framebuffe
Package: libavifile-0.7c102
Version: 1:0.7.38.20030710-1.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libavifile-0.7c102: Depends: libxvidcore4 (>= 1:1.0.0-0.0) which is a virtual
package.
This library is not (and cannot be?) availab
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-1
Followup-For: Bug #295477
I ran into this too. In general, maintainer scripts that use debconf
and start background processes (particularly daemons that will run
indefinitely) should first call db_stop to avoid trouble. However,
AFAICT, autofs's postin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 295477 sid
Bug#295477: autofs upgrade freezes (when configured)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:54:05AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Then it freezes. I need to type Ctrl-C and I get:
>
> dpkg: error processing autofs (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Interrupt)
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> autofs
> E: Sub-p
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When upgrading autofs:
Setting up autofs (4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-1) ...
Stopping automounter: done.
Starting automounter: done.
Then it freezes. I need to type Ctrl-C and I get:
dpkg: error processing
[I never received the mail found in BTS, probably because our mailin
drops mail from dialups]
> Hi Thiemo,
>
> Did you compile it in a chroot using pbuilder ? If not, could you try
> that? It is possible the invocation of sclang fails in a chroot because
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH gets overriden.
I didn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 294867 kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
Bug#294867: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx
Bug reassigned from package `hotplug' to `kernel-image-2.6.8-i38
> Lots of information is missing from your report, that will be needed to fix
> the problem. (I use evolution and delete mail everyday, so clearly there's
> a problem related to your specific configuration).
I may have guessed the problem. I had less free disk space than the size of
the Inbox fil
Osamu Aoki schrieb am Wednesday, den 16. February 2005:
> We are fixing CJK issues in debiandoc-sgml for good. We can build
> Korean PDF too. Quite busy on it.
Great to hear that there is work being done!
> Funny thing is I do not have problem in i386 pbuilder.
With 1.2.3? It works fine with
severity 294174 important
thanks
I don't see any reason to consider it RC for this package to not work
correctly with *all* kernels we're shipping; as long as it builds correct
modules for the 2.4.27 kernel we ship, I think it's perfectly acceptable to
release without 2.6 support.
--
Steve Langa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 294174 important
Bug#294174: installed modules not linked for kernel 2.6 (.ko)
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Good Afternoon!
Recenty intrdocuced legislation requires business and home users to print
personal and business checks with security blank check stock and magnetic ink.
Please find qualified suppliers at Google by clicking on the followingl link.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&i
reassign 294407 curl
severity 294407 minor
thanks
This is not a bug in the libldap2 package. The libldap2 package has all its
files in the right place; it is a curl bug to be dlopen()ing libldap.so
instead of libldap.so.2. This is self-evident if you consider the meaning
of the library soname --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 294407 curl
Bug#294407: Development package cannot be need to use dynamic version of library
Bug reassigned from package `libldap2-dev' to `curl'.
> severity 294407 minor
Bug#294407: Development package cannot be need to use dynamic version of
tags 295170 patch
severity 295170 important
thanks
hi satoh-san,
i'm lowering the severity to something more proper (unless i'm
mistaken this is only a broken cron job, which doesn't warrant
grave severity).
i'm also adding the "patch" tag, and i'd expect to see a
fix in the next upload.
thank
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295170 patch
Bug#295170: Clients in maintainer scripts read /root/.my.cnf and fail
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> severity 295170 important
Bug#295170: Clients in maintainer scripts read /root/.my.cnf and fail
Severity set to `importa
> Joey Hess has already fixed what seems to be the very same bug in
> 4.1.2-2.1
Joey's NMU included a fix for the queue command only; it did not include a
fix for the bouncequeue command, which suffers from the same bug.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Package: tnftp
Version: 2.0beta1-1
Followup-For: Bug #285902
I've prepared a package from new upstream sources for a possible NMU. Would
you care to check and upload it? I haven't fixed any packaging problems that
lintian and linda complain about to minimise the changes, but if there is a
need and
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) :
> Quoting Jean Charles Delepine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: sympa
> > Version: 4.1.2-2.1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: user security hole
>
> Joey Hess has already fixed what seems to be the very same bug in
> 4.1.2-2.1
Yes.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295012 sid
Bug#295012: aspell-ca: Support for pending Aspell 0.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tags 295011 sid
Bug#295011: aspell-da: Support for pending Aspell 0.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tags 295010 sid
Bug#29501
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295427 sid
Bug#295427: beecrypt_2.2.0-pre1-4(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken
libtool.m4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 294966 normal
Bug#294966: clamav-daemon: Segmentation fault on startup
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 294966 +moreinfo
Bug#294966: clamav-daemon: Segmentation fault on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tags 294966 +unre
We are fixing CJK issues in debiandoc-sgml for good. We can build
Korean PDF too. Quite busy on it.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:04:02PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> It has been over two weeks now since this most recent update, I am
> curious what is happening?
Funny thing is I do not have prob
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 290638 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#290638: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: Freeze with new Gtk 2.6 libraries
Tags were: pending fixed-upstream experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 292488 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#292488: sylpheed-claws-gtk2:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:17:59AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I've uploaded aspell 0.60 today, so these dictionary bugs are now RC.
Will upload ASAP.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
G
Quoting Jean Charles Delepine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: sympa
> Version: 4.1.2-2.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: user security hole
Joey Hess has already fixed what seems to be the very same bug in
4.1.2-2.1
As far as I can see, this bug should be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 05:47:50AM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Martin Orr said:
> >
> > ***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_LANG_PROGRAM
>
> Does it build if you remove autoconf2.13?
Yes, thanks.
Could you change configure.in to have AC_PREREQ(2.50) at the top?
--
Martin Orr
Linux Administ
It has been over two weeks now since this most recent update, I am
curious what is happening?
>If there is build error in Chinese (Simplified), there are few possible
>root causes:
>
> * something chenged in TEX/LATEX (Build system)
> * I accidentaly broke some text encoding somewhere recently whi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294139 -sarge
Bug#294139: USB Config Descriptor All Zeros on arm
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge
> close 294139
Bug#294139: USB Config Descriptor All Zeros on arm
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug cl
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:54:54 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gEDA* installable in unstable now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:52:38 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in maintainer upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:52:38 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in maintainer upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:54:54 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gEDA* installable in unstable now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 295439 !
Bug#295439: postfix: postfix in experimental fails to install
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:46:40 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
package: postfix
version: 2.2-20050209-1
severity: grave
justification: renders package unusable
tags: experimental
I attempted to build the latest version of postfix in experimental from
source, however it fails to install:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/arch/mail$ sudo dpkg -i postfix*20050209*.deb
dpkg:
Martin Orr said:
>
> ***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_LANG_PROGRAM
Does it build if you remove autoconf2.13?
... Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 293865 libxml2
thanks
Mike,
I believe this is a bug in libxml2, rather than it the dcgui-qt package that
it was reported against. A search for libxml2 API docs on the web turns up
pages that show UTF8Toisolat1() is allowed to return 0, -1, or -2; if the
new version is returning other va
I'm still seeing this bug on the sarge RC2 installer with a SunBlade
1500. I'm unable to boot the system either from HD or CD using SILO from
unstable, but the same kernel (2.6.8-2) works fine over netboot or with
SILO from woody.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 293865 libxml2
Bug#293865: libxml2 2.6.16 does not work with DCGUI-QT
Bug reassigned from package `dcgui-qt' to `libxml2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi!
Regarding your bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=295270
Lots of information is missing from your report, that will be needed to fix
the problem. (I use evolution and delete mail everyday, so clearly there's
a problem related to your specific configuration).
Are yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295007 grave
Bug#295007: aspell-no: Support for pending Aspell 0.60
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 295008 grave
Bug#295008: aspell-nl: Support for pending Aspell 0.60
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 295009 grave
Bug#295009: aspell-fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 295350 libimlib2
Bug#295350: kompose crashes with undefined symbol: imlib_context_set_display on
sid-amd64
Bug reassigned from package `kompose' to `libimlib2'.
> tags 295350 patch
Bug#295350: kompose crashes with undefined symbol: imlib_cont
Package: aspell-tl
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[Sorry about the lack of warning. I missed this dictionary as one of
the ones I needed to file a wishlist bug against.]
I've just uploaded Aspell 0.60 to Debian unstable. Since the binary
format of the dictionaries has c
Package: beecrypt
Version: 2.2.0-pre1-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of beecrypt_2.2.0-pre1-4 on remake by sbuild/mipsel 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050215-1526
The version of libtool used to build this source package is t
Package: apache2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
I have built recently built versions 2.0.53-{1,2,3} of apache2 successfully.
However version 2.0.53-4 fails, the output ending with:
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached)
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:12:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Lib file gets installed incorrectly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:12:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Lib file gets installed incorrectly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:02:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295407: fixed in reportbug 3.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Subject: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.9-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After an upgrade, amavis started spewing a lot of emergency errors and
stoped working (bringing down all mail delivery with it).
I use the Courier m
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:58:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
severity 295386 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:45:48 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: reportbug
> Version: 3.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> The reportbug package asks users to pick from a list of severities by name,
> givin
severity 294966 normal
tags 294966 +moreinfo
tags 294966 +unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:37:43AM +0100, Thilo Pfennig said:
> Am Montag, den 14.02.2005, 15:04 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gran:
> > This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> > > I think we have to look elsewhere fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295386 wishlist
Bug#295386: reportbug should not ask novice users to pick RC severities by name
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: sympa
Version: 4.1.2-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
- Forwarded message from Aumont - Comite Reseaux des Universites <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> -
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:09:54 +0100
From: Aumont - Comite Reseaux des Universites <[
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
The conf files for reportbug are created world-readable. For users of
smart-hosts this represents a security hole since it exposes their
passwords on that host for any local user to pick up. Heck, reportbug
even
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 295175 xfree86-common,xdm
Bug#295175: xfree86-common faild to purge, breaking buildds in interesting ways
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86-common' to `xfree86-common,xdm'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 2194:2195 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 295175 + pending
Bug#295175: xfree86-common f
Package: t-prot
Version: 1.96-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi!
From the NEWS.Debian:
t-prot (1.96-1) unstable; urgency=low
* This is a v2.0 pre-release. It contains a switch from inline locale strings
to the Locale::gettext perl module. Pretty please report any things you
no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295358 important
Bug#295358: emacs21-nox: purge all X support succeeded in 100%
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:02:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295314: fixed in transcriber 1.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294406 -sarge
Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247)
Tags were: sarge woody patch security
Tags removed: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The reportbug package asks users to pick from a list of severities by name,
giving lengthy text explanations of the severities. Experience shows that
novice users tend to overestimate the severity of their
Update:
I've ask the ftp master for removal of digikamplugins. See #295363.
Achim
--
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:02:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202627: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.42.20050215-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:02:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228072: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.42.20050215-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295363 - pending
Bug#295363: RM: digikamplugins -- RoM; package useless after API change
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi,
I have put together a patch for /usr/share/kernel-package/rules.
It reverts (and thus probably reopens) the changes of bug #285688.
With the patch make-kpkg works for me again.
Regards,
Bastian
--
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG Schlüssel
`. `
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 295149 + patch
Bug#295149: kernel-package: it fails to build my kernel with strange error
message
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping process
The "source ../test/test.tcl" now works. :)
It's now runinng the standard tests.
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 17:23 +1100, Michael Cahill wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> My name is Michael Cahill and I am with Sleepycat Software.
> Carol Sandstrom asked me to reply to your
Quoting Marius Mikucionis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: emacs21-nox
> Version: 21.3+1-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> congratulations. you did it. now I go to my X window manager menu,
> select emacs and get nothing.
> I lost one day of work fidling, trying to f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 290111 -1
Bug#290111: digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers
Bug 290111 cloned as bug 295363.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#295363: digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers
Bug reassigned from package `digikamplugins' to `ftp.debian.org'
Package: emacs21-nox
Version: 21.3+1-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
congratulations. you did it. now I go to my X window manager menu,
select emacs and get nothing.
I lost one day of work fidling, trying to find out what's wrong
and that good old emacs21 with GUI is gon
I downloaded the build-deps and sources of libimlib2, built it from
source, installed it and now kompose works.
Sorry for the noise
cheers Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kompose
Version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi
when starting kompose from the console i get the following
error-message:
kompose
KomposeSettings::instance() - Creating Singleton instance
KomposeGlobal
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:20:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is kind of fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
this does not happen in locale CC.
it crashes in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-14 10:50]:
> I received 2 mails in less than 4 hours asking whether build9 fits for a
> stable release. Instead of answering again and again, here is my point:
Thanks.
> It's hard to say.
Yes, definitely.
> It's already playable as is. Solo games
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295344 unreproducible
Bug#295344: segfaults on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:33:54AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> A bit more tests ...
>
> 4) calling on a plain kernel-tree the following line, as called by the
> powerpc kernel package, fails :
>
> LANG=C MFLAGS=" -w" MAKEFLAGS="w -- flavour=powerpc" make-kpkg build
>
> 5) calling on
Package: gxine
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
..
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages gxine depends
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:58:26AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >Package: ejabberd
> >Version: 0.7.5-5
> >Severity: grave
> >Tags: sarge
> >
> >
> >This is a reminder that the archived bug #282836 (ejabberd: Fails
> >with erlang in testing) is still pre
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>Package: ejabberd
>Version: 0.7.5-5
>Severity: grave
>Tags: sarge
>
>
>This is a reminder that the archived bug #282836 (ejabberd: Fails
>with erlang in testing) is still present in sarge.
Hello Adrian,
unfortunately I have currently no real net access.
Hello,
After a bit more investigation, i think i managed to isolate what causes the
problem :
1) building a plain kernel-tree with http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/rules
with or without LANG=C works.
2) building the powerpc kernel-patch-2.6.(8|10) with
http://people.debian.org/~srivas
Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:02:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294398: fixed in farpd 0.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295314 sid
Bug#295314: transcriber_1.5.1-0(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 294755 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#294755: FTBFS in experimental
Tags were: experimental
Bug#295228: FTBFS in experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 295228 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#295228: FTBFS in experimental
Tags were: fixed-in-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295315 grave
Bug#295315: pppoeconf: sed command fails when user contains a / character
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
100 matches
Mail list logo
