Hello,

After a bit more investigation, i think i managed to isolate what causes the
problem : 

  1) building a plain kernel-tree with http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/rules
  with or without LANG=C works.

  2) building the powerpc kernel-patch-2.6.(8|10) with
  http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/rules and LANG=C breaks.

  3) building the powerpc kernel-patch-2.6.(8|10) with
  http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/rules but without LANG=C works.

(So much for using LANG=C to make the error message non-french speaker
friendly :).

I don't know what the difference between the 8.121 rules and the above one is
though, will test it once my build completes, which should be another 9-12
hours.

Manoj, does this help ? Any info on what changes are in
http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/rules ? 

It definitively seems like the problem is some interaction between LANG=C,
make-kpkg and the way it is called. 

A bit more tests ...

  4) calling on a plain kernel-tree the following line, as called by the
  powerpc kernel package, fails :
  
    LANG=C MFLAGS=" -w" MAKEFLAGS="w -- flavour=powerpc" make-kpkg build

  5) calling on a plain kernel-tree the following line, as called by the
  powerpc kernel package, works :
  
    MFLAGS=" -w" MAKEFLAGS="w -- flavour=powerpc" make-kpkg build

  6) calling on a plain kernel-tree the following line, as called by the
  powerpc kernel package, works :
  
    LANG=C MFLAGS=" -w" make-kpkg build

I am a bit in the vague about the significance of exactly what those options
mean, especially the MAKEFLAGS though. And it seems obvious that something
with them breaks kernel-package.

In retrospect, i think it makes sense, since rules complain about some
misformed version string, and the flavour=powerpc is the one which is included
in the version, but maybe the way i use it is just broken ? Inherited from
Jens Schmalzing though, i used to do it differently.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to