On 23/04/2025 12:25, Graham Leggett wrote:
I think I figured this out - there is no licenserecon for bookworm so I was
flying blind.
You can download it from here
https://software.opensuse.org//download.html?project=home%3APeterBBB&package=licenserecon
Regards,
Peter
Salsa CI now running here
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xfce-polkit/-/pipelines
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfce-polkit":
* Package name : xfce-polkit
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream contact : Natanael Copa
* URL : https://github.com/ncopa/xfce-polkit
* License
On 13/04/2025 10:09, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
This licenses themselves clearly state "MIT". Why is the tool
detecting them as Expat?
Seems like a false positive to me.
The workaround suggested in
https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/licenserecon/lrc.1.en.html is to
skip these files using debian/l
On 11/04/2025 09:53, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: libkdsingleapplication-qt6-dev
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.0
libkdsingleapplication-qt6-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This m
Hi,
I can't reproduce this. CDs are playing just fine for me.
However, I'm not seeing these MusicBrainz messages.
I suggest try disabling MusicBrainz and see if that helps.
(Plenty of other providers of Album Covers).
Also, I would suggest raising an issue upstream here;
https://forum.strawberr
On 05/04/2025 06:34, Phil Wyett wrote:
Has 'or' for multiple license options yet to be implemented or do you see this
as another issue?
Hi Phil,
licenserecon does not need any particular implementation of 'or' license
constructs.
It merely compares license strings from licensecheck with those
The first two lines of the files are;
// Feel free to copy from this example to your own code
// SPDX-License-Identifier: 0BSD OR BSL-1.0 OR MIT-0
but licensecheck detects the license as just 0BSD,
missing the 'OR BSL-1.0 OR MIT-0' part.
Hello,
Its disappointing that Nvidia won't provide better support for their
products!
My understanding is that the GT710 needs this driver. Its still being
sold as new;
https://www.cclonline.com/gt-710-2gd3h-lp-msi-geforce-gt-710-2gb-graphics-card/
Popcon shows around 800 users of this pack
pascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2024-October/062468.html
Regards,
Peter B
Package: libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.0
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed-upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
If an application is using libkdsingleapplication version 1.0,
SSH command line options cannot be used.
This is fixed upstream in 1.1
https://gi
On 09/03/2025 08:51, Phil Wyett wrote:
Test 4 (sbuild): Information only
Not an issue as such, but I would not put an override on 'Standards-Version'.
Hi Phil,
the override is there because newer-standards-version is a warning,
and so breaks the Salsa CI pipeline when SALSA_CI_LINTIAN_FAIL_WA
On 09/03/2025 08:51, Phil Wyett wrote:
Test 5 (ratt): Information only
Information only as this package is in the nextcloud team.
2025/03/09 08:20:49 FAILED: owncloud-client (see buildlogs/owncloud-
client_5.2.1.13040+dfsg-3.0.1)
Error:
[ 76%] Linking CXX executable ../bin/OwncloudPropagatorT
On 08/03/2025 15:40, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Saturday, March 8, 2025 8:21:32 AM MST Peter B wrote:
> I'm not at all sure about this.
> It seems to me that the Policy wording is ambiguous,
> as I would interpret "copyright information" to imply both the copyright
&g
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
thanks
Additionally, I would remove the empty 'd/patches' directory.
Dropped the empty folder,
Thanks for reviewing,
Regards,
Peter
On 08/03/2025 11:59, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Friday, March 7, 2025 11:26:49 PM MST Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > Test 7 (licenserecon): Information
> > >
> > > d/copyright | licensecheck
> > >
> > > BSD-2-clause | FSFULLR config.rpath
> >
> > I think this is covered by policy 2.3:
>
On 08/03/2025 06:19, Phil Wyett wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 3.6
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
Could we exclude the files that are part of the build process?
Example: autotools
Files such as (etc.):
config.rpath
See debian policy section below.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debia
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "kdsingleapplication":
* Package name : kdsingleapplication
Version : 1.1.0-1+nmu1
Upstream contact : KDAB
* URL : https://kdab.github.io/KDSingleApplication/
On 14/02/2025 06:14, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: qt6ct
Version: 0.10-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
qt6ct fails to cross build from source, because debian/rules contains a
workaround for a higher level failure. qtpaths6 used to emit the wrong
multiarch direct
Package: ifstat
Version: 1.1.1-2+b1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
ifstat used to build on hurd-i386 until
the +b1 attempt on 29-11-2024
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ifstat&arch=hurd-i386
Now build
On 04/02/2025 12:40, Reinhard Karcher wrote:
Package: fp-compiler-3.2.2
Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-43
Severity: serious
Justification: unnown
Dear Maintainer,
Upgrade to version 3.2.2+dfsg-43 from -40 produced compilation errors.
I used the lazarus command compilation. The compilation aborted with
th
On 25/01/2025 17:22, Thorsten de Jong wrote:
(Lese Datenbank ... 900231 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../lazarus-src-3.8_3.8+dfsg1-1_all.deb ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 10: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des
On 17/01/2025 09:42, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 21:57 +, Peter B wrote:
I'm thinking now, that src:lazarus and src:castle-model-viewer are the
only packages that would benefit in any way.
I think only libraries will be affected by a rebuild requirement.
This
Hi Paul,
On 05/01/2025 21:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 05-01-2025 19:22, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
As per the agreement about using 'Static-Built-Using' field by
packages compiling with FPC, I reassign this ticket to winff so that
maintainer can add the field and close this ticket.
Two remar
Hi,
before seeing this bug report, I had updated strawberry to build with
the taglib 2.0.2-1
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=strawberry&ver=1.2.4-1
so as things stand, this bug no longer affects strawberry.
Please give me a heads up if libtag-c-dev is being removed (and not
'pr
F.Y.I. from build log;
CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:256 (find_package):
Could not find a configuration file for package "KDSingleApplication-qt6"
that is compatible with requested version "1.1.0".
The following configuration files were considered but not accepted:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linu
On 11/01/2025 15:09, Boyuan Yang wrote:
Source: strawberry
Severity: withlist
Version: 1.2.3-1
Dear Debian strawberry package maintainer,
Your package has an optional build-dependency of KDSingleApplication,
which is not enabled during building. You may make use of it
through https://tracker.de
On 09/01/2025 15:02, Willem Vermin wrote:
findent (4.3.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
Hi Willem,
I suggest make this urgency=medium
Hopefully the upstream release does useful stuff!
No need to delay migration.
Cheers,
Peter
a new version of view3dscene with a new name.
Regards,
Peter B
On 05/01/2025 18:22, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 14:53 +0100, Peter B wrote:
Setting the 'Static-Built-Using' field in the control files of packages
built with fpc should fix this.
Oops, I meant to update my comment on that after further investigation!
I h
On 22/12/2024 06:43, Helge Deller wrote:
Adding this section somewhere at the top of debian/rules file fixes it
for me:
ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),hppa)
CXXFLAGS += -mlong-calls
export CXXFLAGS
endif
Hi Helge,
Thanks for providing this fix.
Cheers,
Peter
On 23/11/2024 15:14, Christian Göttsche wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 3.1
Dear Maintainer,
while working on packaging systemd-netlogd[1] I noticed some, whats
looks to me as, false positives:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your report.
In general, its helpful though to have separate bug rep
On 17/11/2024 19:19, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 3.0
Severity: normal
Hi, today I tried to convert to spdx name d/copyright of one project
and checking with lrc --spdx I saw still showed debian name instead,
here a link to the salsa-ci job but I tried also manually on S
On 08/11/2024 11:14, Markus Blatt wrote:
If I run lcr on the source package containing it then it thinks that this file
is licensed under EPL because of the word Eclipse appearing in the comment.
Thanks for reporting this.
It seems that the word Eclipse, case sensitive, the first word on a lin
On 08/11/2024 11:14, Markus Blatt wrote:
I have a source file ...
If I run lcr on the source package containing it ...
Hi Markus,
I assume you are referring to
opm/simulators/flow/FlowThresholdPressure.hpp
in package
opm-simulators ?
The comment does say;
"This class calculates the t
A more complete log of the error
(3104) Compiling debugmanager.pas
(10001) PPU Loading
/home/peter/.lazarus/lib/laz.virtualtreeview_package/lib/x86_64-linux-gtk2/laz.virtualtrees.ppu
(10011) PPU Source: laz.virtualtrees.pas not found
(10011) PPU Source: laz.vtconfig.inc not available
(10011) PP
Package: lintian
Version: 2.119.0
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
Since the release of version 2.119.0, the package trackers for many
(possibly all)
packages that have Appstream metadata are showing the warning
"appstream-metadata-validation-failed".
On 27/10/2024 09:20, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Do you agree with this reading of DEP5?
Is it a bug that licenserecon doesn't support recursive globbing of the
wildcards?
Hi Simon,
Possibly, but it seems to me that it very much goes against the grain of
DEP5 being "machine readable".
The file
Hi Simon,
Please attach your copyright file so I can test.
Cheers,
Peter
F.Y.I
The file used to be called lrc.excludes when it was intended just to
contain excludes.
When usage was expanded to include options, I renamed it to lrc.config.
For compatibility, lrc still processes debian/lrc.excludes
but the file in usr is now lrc.config.
Regards,
Peter
On 26/10/2024 19:13, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 2.1
Hi! I noticed this problem in the gssproxy package, for this file:
https://sources.debian.org/src/gssproxy/0.9.2-2/contrib/gssproxy.spec.in/
It contains this string `License: MIT` and licensecheck reports:
gssprox
On 26/10/2024 19:15, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 2.1
Hi! Man lrc says:
EXCLUSIONS
False positives may suppressed by creating a file debian/lrc.excludes
List in the file, the file names and/or directories to be excluded.
The syntax for the file
I can't reproduce any crash with
lazarus 3.6 & gdb 15
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, pe...@pblackman.plus.com,
pkg-pascal-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name : libqt6pas
Version : 1
Upstream Contact: N/A (See URL below)
* URL : https://www.lazarus-ide
Package: libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.0
Version: 1.0.0-2+b2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
A new upstream version of KDSingleApplication was released in Dec 2023
https://github.com/KDAB/KDSingleApplication/releases
Regards,
Peter B
command is that log is,
fpc -Cg -Sj- -Co -Ci -Cr -CR -Sa -Sh- -vhqw -O4 -k-pie -k-znow lrc.pas
Regards,
Peter B
Package: licensecheck
Version: 3.3.9-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
In package audacious-plugins, the src/skins directory,
many GPL3 licensed files are detected as just GPL.
For example, file plugin.h has header,
* This program is free software; you
e the name to lrc.config, but parse both for backwards
compatibility.
Thanks for reporting these issues,
Regards,
Peter B
he file names and/or directories to be excluded. The
syntax for the file is described in /usr/share/lrc/lrc.excludes|
Regards,
Peter B
||
On 04/07/2024 14:18, asciiw...@seznam.cz wrote:
Package: lazarus
Version: 3.0+dfsg1-8
This happens in GNOME, but will probably also happen in other desktop
environments.
FWIW, there is no problem with the icon display in Xfce.
Regards,
Peter
On 11/08/2024 09:01, Phil Wyett wrote:
d/copyright | licensecheck
Apache-2.0 | Apache pyproject.toml
Offending file contains:
license = { text = 'Apache-2.0' }
classifiers = [
'Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable',
'Intended Audience :: Developers',
'
On 12/08/2024 17:27, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 1.14
Severity: normal
For some reason, licenserecon doesn't detect the BSD license for the files in
the
vendor subfolder. The only license listed in debian/copyright is GPL-3+.
https://salsa.debian.org/manuelguerra/baby
Hi Soren,
On 06/08/2024 22:11, Soren Stoutner wrote:
This might not be a scenario that is possible to accurately handle in an
automated fashion.
Agreed.
I'll consider implementing an override feature,
to handle problem files like this.
lrc already has a hardwired internal list of excluded
On 06/08/2024 16:40, Phil Wyett wrote:
Package: licenserecon
Version: 1.14
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Please make the 'lrc' manual page more useful i.e. adding switches etc.
Regards
Phil
Hi Phil,
The brief man page tells users to run 'lrc -h'
to get help, including the options.
Thi
On 06/08/2024 22:28, Soren Stoutner wrote:
d/copyright | licensecheck
GFDL-NIV-1.3+ | GFDL-1.3+doc/index.docbook
Hi Soren,
Thanks for your report.
Its probably a bug in licensecheck.
I'll clone the bug there, and do a workaround in licenserecon.
Regards,
Peter
On 29/07/2024 17:05, Gábor Németh wrote:
+ Kindly ask to change the subject to version 8.6.*2*-1 please.
Thanks,
Gábor
Hi Gábor,
You can change this yourself. It is your 'bug' after all.
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#retitle
Regards,
Peter
On 28/07/2024 13:08, Phil Wyett wrote:
. If a DD is happy to upload the package as
is, it is all good.
Regards
Phil
Hi Phil, Michael,
maybe remove the moreinfo tab then?
Otherwise, potential sponsors may not look at this RFS.
Regards,
Peter
: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:03:19 +0100
From: Peter B
Reply-To: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
To: 1069...@bugs.debian.org
CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Maytham Alsudany
On 14/07/2024 16:54, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
Hi,
Ping for further feedback or seconds for proposed policy change
On 14/07/2024 16:54, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
Hi,
Ping for further feedback or seconds for proposed policy change to
clarify and document the use of the Static-Built-Using field.
Hi Maytham,
could also mention that this field would be useful for fpc & lazarus
packages.
https://bugs.debian.or
On 14/07/2024 10:55, Phil Wyett wrote:
Hi Peter,
While we are waiting for a sponsor. It seems the release tag is not signed -
Regards
Phil
Hi Phil, Thanks for that. It seems the tag had not been pushed either!!
Anyway, now fixed. Regards, Peter
HEAD ()
refs/heads/master ()
uscan in
On 02/07/2024 14:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: fpc
Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
Project developers
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
o
On 09/07/2024 10:33, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 12:19:10 +0100 Peter B wrote:
On 07/07/2024 04:04, Phil Wyett wrote:
Peter,
Would you please update the standards version in 'debian/control' to the latest
4.7.0[1] as per
current Debian policy.
[1] https://www.debian.org/
On 07/07/2024 04:04, Phil Wyett wrote:
Peter,
Would you please update the standards version in 'debian/control' to the latest
4.7.0[1] as per
current Debian policy.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Regards
Phil
Hi Phil,
Thanks for reviewing. I've updated the control file, al
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-pascal-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "c-evo-dh":
* Package name : c-evo-dh
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream co
On 24/06/2024 12:22, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: general
Here we are looking at a list of files,
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/gdal-bin/filelist
but cannot click them to see their contents.
Hi Dan,
Try looking here
https://sources.debian.org/src/gdal/3.9.0%2Bdfsg-1/
Regar
On 22/06/2024 16:27, Phil Wyett wrote:
...
2. Lintian: Warning
W: c-evo-map-gen: unknown-field Static-Built-Using
N:
N: See the Policy Manual for a list of the possible fields in a package
N: control files.
...
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the review.
I believe I'm using the field correctly,
On 07/06/2024 02:26, Bas van Besouw wrote:
Package: lazarus
Version: 3.0+dfsg1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Bas,
some general points about bug reporting;
1) The tag ftbfs is used when the package does not build from the
debian source (using debuild or whatever)
https://buildd.debian
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cevomapgen":
* Package name : cevomapgen
Version : 34-1
Upstream contact : Peter Blackman
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/cevomapgen/
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "winff":
* Package name : winff
Version : 1.6.4+dfsg-2
Upstream contact : Matthew Weatherford
* URL : https://github.com/WinFF/winff
* License : GF
On 24/04/2024 20:02, Rene Engelhard wrote:
This bugreport now caused the following "fix" in winff:
Build-Depends-Indep:
faketime,
libreoffice-draw-nogui | libreoffice-draw,
libreoffice-writer-nogui | libreoffice-writer,
which I consider bad...
Hi Rene,
Why is it bad? The nogui's are
Regarding ;-
"(for example linking against static libraries, builds for
source-centered languages such as Go or Rust, usage of header-only
C/C++ libraries, injecting data blobs into code, etc.)"
Perhaps Pascal & Lazarus could be added to that list for clarity? [1]
Regards,
Peter
[1] https:
On 20/04/2024 21:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 20-04-2024 3:22 p.m., Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui
but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages
On 03/04/2024 22:51, Joshua Aspinall wrote:
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?
Hi Josh,
I suggest trying that suggestion "maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?"
Also try installing cdparanoia and wavpack separately.
You can
On 01/04/2024 13:07, Joshua Aspinall wrote:
Package: asunder
Version: 3.0.1+ds-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: joshaspin...@member.fsf.org
Dear Maintainer,
Cannot install Asunder on testing under normal conditions due to wavpack
version not present (reports file not found)
Looking through th
Hi Andreas,
"mpg321 simply produces no sound output here on a system running pipewire."
How strange!
Just wondering; have you got pipewire-alsa installed?
Regards,
Peter
Hi Andreas,
On 27/03/2024 14:57, Andreas Metzler wrote:
mpg321 is dead upstream
I don't see that as a show stopper.
Please consider moving to another player, e.g. mpg123.
I moved away from ffmpeg after c-evo-dh showed a puiparts fail
stemming from libnettle8. c-evo-dh does not use any crypt
On 21/03/2024 13:56, Vadim Kuznetsov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qucs-s":
* Package name : qucs-s
Version : 24.1.0-1
Upstream contact : Vadim Kuznetsov
* URL : https://github.com/ra3xdh/qucs_s
* License : GPL-2.0
* Vcs
Changes since the last upload:
c-evo-dh (1.11-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team maintained (Debian Games team) (1.10-1)
* Add -B (build all dependencies) to d/rules (1.10-1)
* Add shared library linker options to d/rules (1.10-1)
* New Upstream Release
* Update d/co
On 17/03/2024 10:27, Tobias Frost wrote:
The source builds the following binary packages:
cevomapgen - External Map Generator for C-Evo
cevomapgen is a tool for use with c-evo-dh
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/c-evo-dh
Would it make sense to call it also c-evo-mapgen, to use the same sc
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "c-evo-dh":
* Package name : c-evo-dh
Version : 1.11-1
Upstream contact : Peter
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/c-evo-eh/
* License : CC0-
Hi Rene,
Thanks for clarifying. Seems I can use libreoffice-draw-nogui, but need
libreoffice-writer for now as you said.
Cheers,
Peter
Source: lazarus
Version: 3.0+dfsg1-8
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
Cannot build packages with
'lazbuild --ws=qt6'
Builds fail with
'/usr/bin/ld.bfd: cannot find -lQt6Pas: No such file or directory'
Probably needs a libqt6pas package.
See
https://g
Now at upstream version 31
Changes since 26,
cevomapgen (31)
Warn when map size is over 9,600
Workaround for Qt5 SpinEdits broken in Lazarus 3.0
-- Wed, 28 Feb 2024
cevomapgen (30)
Use Smart linking
Use Makefile in Linux builds
-- Tue, 27 Feb 2024
cevomapgen (29)
Rework starti
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "winff":
* Package name : winff
Version : 1.6.3+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : Matthew Weatherford
* URL : https://github.com/WinFF/winff
* License : GF
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:45:28 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Control: found -1 1.6.2+dfsg-2
>
> The fix is insufficient. To reproduce, try converting the file created
> by this command:
>
> touch '`cowsay pwned >&2; sleep inf`.mp3'
>
I'm now escaping backticks. This fixes the issue with above file.
>
Thanks for the patch.
Applied upstream.
licenserecon's reporting GPL-3 vs GPL-3+ as a difference
is not a misleading false positive. They are different licenses.
The latter confers the right to use a later license, the former does not.
kitty's d/copyright file should have a separate file stanza for the
GPL-3 (only) files.
See https:/
While Lazarus release (3.0+dfsg1-6) fixed the immediate problem
of ideconfig.lpk missing, lazbuilds still all fail, now with
"Note: (lazarus) Invalid Package Link: file
"/usr/lib/lazarus/3.0/ide/packages/idedebugger/idedebugger.lpk" does not
exist."
Builds fail on the firts missing (lazarus)
Package: licensecheck
Version: 3.3.9-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
licensecheck outputs BSD licenses as BSD-2-clause & BSD-3-clause,
but the SPDX short-names use title case with upper case C
as in BSD-2-Clause & BSD-3-Clause.
https://
I have found another example of misdetection of GPL-3
In most of the files in https://sources.debian.org/src/xbrzscale/1.8-2/xbrz/
the license is given in the line
// * GNU General Public License:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0 *
but licensecheck detects as just GPL.
Changing th
lrc parses a valid DEP-5 copyright file and notes the licenses of all
files in the source tree. Licensecheck is then run, and the results
compared. Differences between licenses in debian/copyright and the output
of licensecheck are reported.
It should be run in the top level of a cleaned Debian
The Vcs has now moved to
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/licenserecon
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "profile-cleaner":
* Package name : profile-cleaner
Version : 2.45-3
Upstream contact : graysky
* URL : https://github.com/graysky2/profile-cleaner
* Licens
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mp3guessenc":
* Package name : mp3guessenc
Version : 0.27.6~beta+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : eblanc...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : https://mp3guessenc.source
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "c-evo-dh":
* Package name : c-evo-dh
Version : 1.10-1
Upstream contact : Peter
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/c-evo-eh/
* License : GPL-
Hi Davide,
Thanks for reporting this problem.
The game only created the Saved folder if there was something to install in it.
The removal of the original example game (for incompatibility) caused this
regression.
Fix in 1.10
Regards,
Peter
On 29/10/2023 08:27, Jonas Bechtel wrote:
Following conditions have to be met to reproduce the problem:
* The line must be in an extra unit (not application form class unit)
* gdb 13 must be installed (gdb 10 does not crash)
Given that the crash only occurs with gdb 13 and not with gdb 10,
sur
On 22/10/2023 22:15, Bastian Germann wrote:
Meanwhile, you can drop libgtkglext1-dev, which is not used, and unblock
#967491.
Pushed to Salsa, 4.2.0-3
https://salsa.debian.org/pascal-team/view3dscene
On 27/09/2023 10:45, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 23:01:12 +0200 Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Upgrade to GTK3 is planned.
Would it be possible to build with qt5 instead? From a Debian packaging
perspective,
this should already work as opposed to gtk3.
Hi Bastian,
That would may
On 20/09/2023 12:36, Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: unblock -1 by 967564
Please find a patch attached that builds the package with Qt5.
Fix uploaded to Mentors.
Would like to update the VCS, (and setup CI) but need 'maintainer' access to be
able to do that.
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
