yashmayya commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797582617
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an U
yashmayya commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797545799
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an U
yashmayya commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797545799
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an U
codecov-commenter commented on PR #14215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14215#issuecomment-2408304815
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/14215?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
dinoocch commented on code in PR #14214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14214#discussion_r1797525051
##
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/utils/helix/IdealStateGroupCommit.java:
##
@@ -124,34 +124,27 @@ public IdealState commit(HelixManager helixManag
Jackie-Jiang opened a new pull request, #14215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14215
This was introduced in #14150 where `_forwardIndexDisabledColumns` is no
longer extracted in `IndexLoadingConfig`
Fix the behavior in `BaseDefaultColumnHandler` to use the standard way to
jasperjiaguo commented on code in PR #14214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14214#discussion_r1797515746
##
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/utils/helix/IdealStateGroupCommit.java:
##
@@ -124,34 +124,27 @@ public IdealState commit(HelixManager helixM
codecov-commenter commented on PR #14214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14214#issuecomment-2408286429
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/14214?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
codecov-commenter commented on PR #14213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14213#issuecomment-2408272469
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/14213?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
dinoocch opened a new pull request, #14214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14214
This attempts to fix two issues I believe are introduced in
https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13976/
I think both can cause a table's idealstate to be updated into an unintended
state.
W
egalpin opened a new pull request, #14213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14213
Instructions:
1. The PR has to be tagged with at least one of the following labels (*):
1. `feature`
2. `bugfix`
3. `performance`
4. `ui`
5. `backward-incompat`
6.
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #14198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14198#issuecomment-2408237458
These rules are repeated in multiple places, and rule sets are executed
multiple times, introducing extra overhead and currently very hard to manage.
Do you see a better way to re-or
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #14199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14199#discussion_r1797491985
##
pinot-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/broker/requesthandler/BaseSingleStageBrokerRequestHandler.java:
##
@@ -485,6 +490,16 @@ protected BrokerResponse han
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1797478438
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jackie pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/pinot.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new b067ae1924 Extract common MV ser/de logic into Ar
Jackie-Jiang merged PR #14209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14209
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot
chrajeshbabu commented on PR #14015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14015#issuecomment-2408179901
Test case failures may not be relevant to the patch.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
itschrispeck commented on PR #13994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13994#issuecomment-2408125471
> Certain settings are impossible, e.g. only apply cardinality based
optimization and skip optimization for fixed-length type. I'm not too worried
about this limitation, but it would
lnbest0707-uber commented on code in PR #14200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14200#discussion_r1797361307
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/JsonUtils.java:
##
@@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ private JsonUtils() {
// For querying
public static final Str
gortiz commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797336801
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an Unbo
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797326904
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an
yashmayya commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797322234
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an U
yashmayya commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797321234
##
pinot-query-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/runtime/operator/MultistageGroupByExecutor.java:
##
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ private void processAggregate(Tra
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#issuecomment-2407950547
@gortiz Yes! I think we can enable it by default
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797310958
##
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##
@@ -458,6 +458,15 @@ public static class QueryOptionKey {
// executed in an
yashmayya commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797267398
##
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/integration/tests/MultiStageEngineIntegrationTest.java:
##
@@ -1018,6 +1013,28 @@ public void testMVNumericC
egalpin commented on code in PR #13742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13742#discussion_r1797269186
##
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/transport/QueryResponse.java:
##
@@ -49,12 +50,12 @@ enum Status {
/**
* Returns the current server responses w
codecov-commenter commented on PR #14212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14212#issuecomment-2407730694
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/14212?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
gortiz commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797139653
##
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/integration/tests/OfflineClusterIntegrationTest.java:
##
@@ -3729,4 +3729,39 @@ public void testSkipIndexes(boo
gortiz commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797139653
##
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/integration/tests/OfflineClusterIntegrationTest.java:
##
@@ -3729,4 +3729,39 @@ public void testSkipIndexes(boo
gortiz commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1797137662
##
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/integration/tests/MultiStageEngineIntegrationTest.java:
##
@@ -1018,6 +1013,28 @@ public void testMVNumericCast
gortiz opened a new pull request, #14212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14212
This PR fixes 2 non critical but annoying issues in multi-stage:
## Issue 1
Plans from different servers were not correctly merged when segments for
each server produced different plans. For e
ege-st closed pull request #14103: PoC for checking Groovy scripts for shell
script injection attacks
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14103
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
ege-st commented on PR #14103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14103#issuecomment-2407546298
Closing. Had to replace with https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14197
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
ege-st commented on PR #14197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14197#issuecomment-2407474467
Not quite sure what is happening with the failing tests, looks like it's
some CLP tests that are failing.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
gortiz commented on code in PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#discussion_r1796977724
##
pinot-query-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/runtime/operator/MultistageGroupByExecutor.java:
##
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ private void processAggregate(Transf
codecov-commenter commented on PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#issuecomment-2407422806
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/14211?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
yashmayya commented on PR #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211#issuecomment-2407369015
The PR description explains the rationale behind choosing different default
behavior for the v1 and v2 query engines here. However, this currently means
that there's no way to disable t
yashmayya opened a new pull request, #14211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14211
- Fixes https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12647 and
https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13982.
- Both the above issues have a good description of the problem but the TLDR
is that for grou
gortiz commented on PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#issuecomment-2407330774
@Jackie-Jiang Question: Should we also set
`pinot.broker.enable.partition.metadata.manager` to true by default?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796900105
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
gortiz commented on issue #14196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/14196#issuecomment-2407312666
Let's try to trust internet and open comments for everyone :D
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796851649
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
chrajeshbabu commented on code in PR #14015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14015#discussion_r1796844838
##
pinot-common/pom.xml:
##
@@ -100,22 +100,31 @@
-com.googlecode.fmpp-maven-plugin
-fmpp-maven-plugin
+org.apache.maven.pl
chrajeshbabu commented on code in PR #14015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14015#discussion_r1796821843
##
pinot-common/pom.xml:
##
@@ -100,22 +100,31 @@
-com.googlecode.fmpp-maven-plugin
-fmpp-maven-plugin
+org.apache.maven.pl
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796841573
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796836057
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/routing/WorkerManager.java:
##
@@ -484,79 +507,119 @@ private PartitionTableInfo getPartitionTableInfo(String
chrajeshbabu commented on code in PR #14015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14015#discussion_r1796831201
##
pinot-common/pom.xml:
##
@@ -100,22 +100,31 @@
-com.googlecode.fmpp-maven-plugin
-fmpp-maven-plugin
+org.apache.maven.pl
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796828117
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796827534
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796827534
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/calcite/rel/rules/PinotImplicitTableHintRule.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
gortiz commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796825749
##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -1444,8 +1444,10 @@
org.immutables
-value-annotations
+bom
Review Comment:
Probably not given the processo
chrajeshbabu commented on code in PR #14015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14015#discussion_r1796821843
##
pinot-common/pom.xml:
##
@@ -100,22 +100,31 @@
-com.googlecode.fmpp-maven-plugin
-fmpp-maven-plugin
+org.apache.maven.pl
gortiz commented on code in PR #14210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14210#discussion_r1796787011
##
pinot-controller/pom.xml:
##
@@ -121,13 +122,13 @@
-npm ci
+npm ci
Review Comment:
IIRC npm install
codecov-commenter commented on PR #14210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14210#issuecomment-2406887901
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/pinot/pull/14210?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&u
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #13943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/13943#discussion_r1796556857
##
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/routing/WorkerManager.java:
##
@@ -484,79 +507,119 @@ private PartitionTableInfo getPartitionTableInfo(
bziobrowski opened a new pull request, #14210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14210
This PR speeds up developer build (one with pinot-fastdev profile enabled)
by skipping compression and e.g. npm validation.
Following build command on my desktop :
`mvn -DskipTests=true --als
57 matches
Mail list logo