Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:22:11PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote: > > > > There is no retaliation involved. If subject lines are phrased such > > that the poster has shown respect for the reader, then it will pass the > > procmail rules that Hal's posted so far. > > That's the way I feel about it. Get home, bad day, a zillion emails, > and THEN I have to decide if I am good enough to respond to something > on a public list. No thanks. Post in a public place, and take your > chances, please. I found it (mildly) insulting. I'm sure that wasn't > the intent, but what I posted was my way of expressing my reaction. No > animosity to anyone at all, just a procmail rule to speak for me. I > suspected I was not alone in my reaction either. There is an art in > dealing with lists: both how to get the answers you want, and how not > to deal with stuff you don't have time to deal with. > > Thanks guys :)
I stand corrected. It can easily be seen multiple ways. Does a FAQ exist for this list on usage and guidelines (much like you would see for a news group)? If so - perhaps reposting it in the interest of reminding those who offend would be in order. Sorry for the confusion, -Rick -- Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home) PGP Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
