I don't have a K10 to do comparisons with, but everything I've seen on 
this list indicates that the *ist-D/Ds have better noise performance at 
3200 than the K10D has at 1600.  What is the major difference, the size 
of the sensor sites.  Even at 12mp a 1.3x crop sensor will have sites 
larger than the K10D and as large or larger than those on the *ist D/Ds. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, the larger sensor would undoubtedly reduce noise somewhat, but I doubt 
> that it could achieve the noise level the K10D at 800 when shooting at 3200 
> -- as asked for in this wish list.
> Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   
>> Just the 1.3x crop sensor would lead to better noise/high ISO performance.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>     
>>> Good list. I concur. Although I've never had a problem with banding with 
>>> the 
>>>       
>> K10D. Also, the K10D already has a spot to store the IR remote in the 
>> battery 
>> grip. I don't think you'd want to make the camera itself larger to 
>> accommodate 
>> this. But for those of us who have know problem with size and therefore use 
>> the 
>> grip, the remote caddy is a great feature. I don't know if the kind of high 
>> ISO 
>> low-noise performance you're asking for is currently possible, but it 
>> certainly 
>> wold be nice. I think there's always going to be a considerable tradeofff 
>> for 
>> ISO 3200 speed. CMOS sensors don't seem to have much of a real advantage 
>> there.
>>     
>>> Paul
>>>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>>> From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> My wish list:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Faster and more accurate AF (I know it is a contradiction in terms
>>>> but we know it is possible  err. dark side)
>>>> 2. Adjustable AF settings ( a user should be able to correct
>>>> back/front focusing)
>>>> 3. Larger sensor (1.3 crop factor) but only if current DA lenses cover
>>>> the 1.3 crop factor.  The reason for this is the physics... larger
>>>> pixels => lower noise.
>>>> 4. faster frame rate.... 5 to 8 fps and the frame rate should be
>>>> adjustable.  ie low,,, 3, med 5, high 8.  8 May be overkill (at least
>>>> for me) but it would be nice to have at least 5fps.
>>>> 5. Quieter operation over all --- Quiter af motors quieter shutter /
>>>> mirror mechanism.
>>>> 6. Higher eyepoint on the viewfider... but don;t mess up the
>>>> viewfinder the k10 finder is too nice to muck up.
>>>> 7. Smarter AF modes... e.g nearest subject, track moving subject
>>>> etc... Nikon have someting of the sort and it really works well.
>>>> 8. A good anti reflective system for the screen that will allow better
>>>> viewing under bright sunlight
>>>> 9. Lower noise and higher iso... up to at least 3200.. I want iso3200
>>>> with the sort of noise we currently get at around 640 -> 800.  A Cmos
>>>> sensor may be the way to go in this respect.
>>>> 10 DNG with compression out of the camera.
>>>> 11. Dual Card Slots (SD) with the ability to write Raw on one and jpeg
>>>> on the other.
>>>> 12. Buttons for WB & ISO.... ie hold a button down and turn a control 
>>>> wheel.
>>>> 13. WB Setting display in viewfinder.
>>>> 14. Better Write speeds to cards.
>>>> 15. Separate AF Assist Lamp. (ie no need to popup flash)
>>>> 16. Intervalometer accessible throught the menu. (IE TS110 cable
>>>> release functions built into the firmware).  This should be easy.
>>>> 17. Bundled IR Remote with a gizmo to keep it permanently attached in
>>>> some way e.g. to the camera strap or the base of the camera.
>>>> 18. Higher res 12->16mp but not at the expense of adding noise 10MP is
>>>> fine for me.
>>>> 19. Addon for wireless transfer to PC
>>>> 20.  REMOVE ALL TRACES OF BANDING.... .... NOISE IS ACCEPTABLE BANDING IS 
>>>>         
>> NOT.
>>     
>>>> 21. An updated lens line up .... Fast primes and fast zooms.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>> -- 
>> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to