No, he did share private emails by stating They were abusive but in fact I did no such Thing. He also stated he would never deal with Me again like some kind of warning to anyone Else reading this list. I gave him full benefit Of the doubt on that deal and I even offered him A total fucking refund INCLUDING shipping BOTH Ways and he has the nerve to even bring up That matter? What a complete jerk. My ebay record Is superb as a seller, he is just trying to Destroy my reputation without cause because Of the abusive posts ( two way street I might add ) this week. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:51 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:02:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/24/2006 9:51:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > JCO is an eBay vendor. Vendor reputations are based not only on the > product they sell, but how they deal with customer service issues. If a > vedor treats his custmers like crap ( I am presuming Shel is being > truthful based on JCO's conduct on list), then he has every right (and > perhaps a duty to warn his friends) to tell the world he was badly > treated. > > William Robb > ======== > Personally, I don't think things shared in private email should be shared on > list. Shel didn't share email with the list. He claimed that when he raised an issue about an eBay transaction JCO responded with an abusive email message. That's a very different thing. Accusing Shel of offences of which he is innocent isn't helping things. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
