On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:22 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are both you and him retarded or what? > Why would he chose the LEAST satifactory Just read what I wrote, you halfwit. "Least UNsatisfactory" Your rudeness is unbelievable, but your stupidity is worse. John > Option I gave him. He wouldn't he chose > The BEST option I gave him of course which > Was even better than a full refund including > Shipping both ways which is a complete > Cancellation of the deal with zero cost > To the customer. > > He has no freaking right to complaing if > Chose his so called worst option because that's his > Own stupidity if he is standing by that. > > Secondly, I already stated this many times, > I did not verbally abuse him and my TOTAL > Refund offer is about as good as it gets > When there is a dispute. Thirdly, did you > Read the part about where he made the dispute > WELL AFTER he received the item and I still > Gave him both the full refund offer and partial > Refund offers. You are an idiot if you > Think that I didn't treat him fairly on > That deal because that is as fair as > It gets on item condtion disputes. > > And Fourth, he thought I sold him a "PERFECT" > Lens when the listing made no such condition > Claims whatsoever. He was doomed for dissatisfaction > Right from the start if he expected a PERFECT > Lens when it wasn't listed that way. You cant > Expect MORE than listed and complain about > It if you don't get MORE than listed. > He is just being a malicious person for even > Starting this issue on the thread and IMHO > He had no right to make his initial post the > Way he did considering how that deal was > Handled by both me (good) and him (bad). > > > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John Forbes > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:28 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:24:40 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Boy, there must be something out there lessoning me. I had a recent > deal >> that I was not too happy about. Not the item, but the way the seller > was >> acting. In the end it worked out, but I was up in the air about >> feedback. Now this here, and a thread on another list made my think it >> through, and I realized I could not give a rating based upon what I >> felt, but had to base it upon how the transaction turned out. I just >> left him a positive. >> >> Anyone can make a mistake. All you can do when that happens is offer > to >> make sure it does not cost your customer anything. That means a full >> refund including all shipping. If John offered that then there is no, >> not any, in any, way that the customer has a valid complaint. > > Sorry, I disagree. As Shel has posted, he took a partial refund as the > least unsatisfactory option. Any Ebay dispute is worrying, and I can > imagine that dealing with JCO would be highly traumatic. > > John > >> Now, I will be the first to note that he has no idea of when to shut > up, >> but he seems to share that with a lot of folks here on the list, >> including yours truly at times. But, damn it, once a deal is done it > is >> done. I have always hated those folks who save up complaints to dump > on >> you maybe years later. However, I am going to filter out any further >> posts with JCO in the title, flame wars are not fun to me. >> >> > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
