In a message dated 10/24/2006 11:12:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Shel didn't share email with the list. He claimed that when he raised an issue about an eBay transaction JCO responded with an abusive email message. That's a very different thing.
Accusing Shel of offences of which he is innocent isn't helping things. =========== An issue discussed in private email (or in person) is private -- confidence is confidence. We don't know if it was an abusive email, as our own feelings about constitutes abuse may differ from Shel's. I have seen both JCO and Shel be about what I would call equally abusive back and forth in the JCO survey thread. So I withhold judgment. About the only way Shel could "prove" anything at this point in time, is to actually share JCO's email that he thinks was abusive on list. Which would further violate confidence and Net Etiquette. And it would have to be all the emails they shared back and forth. IMHO, if the buyer/seller matter was settled to both parties satisfaction privately, then it really shouldn't be brought up out of context later to make a point in a public forum. Marnie aka Doe But I will shut up on this now. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
