On 8/16/11 3:44 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 8/16/11 2:38 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> While completing my edits on XEP-0045, I noticed again the feature for >>>> requesting a unique room name. This feature seems unnecessary because >>>> the client can simply generate a unique room name on its own (e.g., by >>>> using a UUID). Shall we remove it? >>> >>> I wasn't convinced there was a compelling reason last time, and I'm >>> still not (I note again that server generated names can achieve more >>> than just uniqueness), to remove this completely (It's an >>> already-deployed feature of a Draft standard), >> >> Is it actually in use? > > ISTR from the discussions previously that Gajim, at least, has deployed it.
Lot of good that does them, if no servers support it. :) In any case, I'm comfortable moving this to a separate spec. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
