On 8/15/11 10:34 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 15 August 2011 12:28, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
>> While completing my edits on XEP-0045, I noticed again the feature for
>> requesting a unique room name. This feature seems unnecessary because
>> the client can simply generate a unique room name on its own (e.g., by
>> using a UUID). Shall we remove it?
>>
> 
> For cross-reference, some older threads:
> 
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2008-August/019518.html
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2006-June/011589.html

Right. I'm going to comment it out in my working version.

> I suddenly feel old for remembering these...

You so are! ;-)


Reply via email to