On 8/16/11 2:38 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >> While completing my edits on XEP-0045, I noticed again the feature for >> requesting a unique room name. This feature seems unnecessary because >> the client can simply generate a unique room name on its own (e.g., by >> using a UUID). Shall we remove it? > > I wasn't convinced there was a compelling reason last time, and I'm > still not (I note again that server generated names can achieve more > than just uniqueness), to remove this completely (It's an > already-deployed feature of a Draft standard),
Is it actually in use? > but if we want to split > it out into another spec I don't think I object. That's the approach I'd like to take, in an effort to slim down the base spec. Not that it's very slim anyway... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
