On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/16/11 2:38 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> While completing my edits on XEP-0045, I noticed again the feature for >>> requesting a unique room name. This feature seems unnecessary because >>> the client can simply generate a unique room name on its own (e.g., by >>> using a UUID). Shall we remove it? >> >> I wasn't convinced there was a compelling reason last time, and I'm >> still not (I note again that server generated names can achieve more >> than just uniqueness), to remove this completely (It's an >> already-deployed feature of a Draft standard), > > Is it actually in use?
ISTR from the discussions previously that Gajim, at least, has deployed it. /K
