On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > While completing my edits on XEP-0045, I noticed again the feature for > requesting a unique room name. This feature seems unnecessary because > the client can simply generate a unique room name on its own (e.g., by > using a UUID). Shall we remove it?
I wasn't convinced there was a compelling reason last time, and I'm still not (I note again that server generated names can achieve more than just uniqueness), to remove this completely (It's an already-deployed feature of a Draft standard), but if we want to split it out into another spec I don't think I object. /K
