On 1/25/10, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, *none* of our schemas provide detailed information about > extensibility because we assume that everything is extensible. That's > one reason why our schemas are descriptive, not normative. Updating all > of our schemas to explicitly define extension points would be a big job.
Ok, although wouldn't that cause problems with validating parsers? Peter -- Peter Mount e: [email protected] w: http://retep.org xmpp:[email protected] MSN: [email protected]
