On 1/22/10 10:51 AM, Peter Mount wrote: > Just looking ahead - we'll be hitting that over the next few weeks, i.e. > section 10 is planned for week 5 and section 15 in week 6. I know we'll > be getting more like this with something as large as muc taking that long. > > For example I'm double checking something of my own over the weekend > which is in section 6 but probably needs talking about when we reach 18 > (Schemas) > > As for muc#roomconfig_publicroom being a tristate i'm not sure. I can > see it being a boolean due to "public" 1 and "hidden" 0, but what affect > would having other values have with existing clients? > > Perhaps this one we should think through whilst we get through the next > set of sections. In Peter's plan its one week for each of the next four > sections (7-10).
I don't mean to limit discussion at all by splitting things up, I just want to make sure that we don't try to review the whole thing at once! Feel free to raise issues like this at any time during the review. In particular, the schemas should be updated throughout the process so any fixes to the schemas are more of a sanity check at the end. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
