On 1/25/10 7:43 AM, Peter Mount wrote: > On 1/25/10, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Well, *none* of our schemas provide detailed information about >> extensibility because we assume that everything is extensible. That's >> one reason why our schemas are descriptive, not normative. Updating all >> of our schemas to explicitly define extension points would be a big job. > > Ok, although wouldn't that cause problems with validating parsers?
Yes. That's why we don't recommend validation. :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
