Ok ignore these in respect to the review - it's correct in the html, so I suspect its to do with the xslt used to generate the pdf's.
Peter On 1/21/10, Peter Mount <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok from tonight's commute I've found a few typo's within section 5. When I > get home I'll check these against the html version just in case they are a > fault in the pdf's: > > 5.1.1 Role Privileges > > In the table for 'Send messages to all' the Visitor column has 'No**' > however the second line below the table is just marked '*'. > > The third line is marked '**' when it should be '***' > > 5.2.1 Affiliation Privileges > > The same thing, the second note after the table is marked '*' & not '**' > > Peter > > -- > Peter Mount (from my BlackBerry) > e: [email protected] > w: http://retep.org > m: +44 (0)7838 191423 / +44 (0)7903 155887 > > Instant Messaging: > Contact me directly via Jabber or GoogleTalk at [email protected] or via MSN > at [email protected] > Alternatively via my BlackBerry at 2542ABDA or via GoogleTalk: > [email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Mount <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:47 > To: Multi-User Chat over XMPP<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [MUC] XEP-0045 review, part 1 > > I'm not 100% certain of these myself so I'm passing these to the list for > comments, but so far: > > Under section 4 - Terminology: > > 1. Rename "Hidden Room" to "Private Room" - although the room is "Hidden" > from view I'm thinking along the lines of Private being the antonym of > Public > > 2: Similarly "Temporary Room" and "Transient Room" - although I suppose it > depends on it's definition and perhaps I'm just thinking along the lines of > a transient within certain languages. > > I'm going to go though sections 5 & 6 again in the morning, but there was > something I came up against a few months back with 6.2 Component Discovery > which I'm going to double check as well - although it will probably end up > being covered at the end under the schema. > > Peter > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> As noted [1] the XSF's new Technical Review Team [2] has decided to kick >> off its activities with a review of XEP-0045: Multi-User Chat. [3] This >> week I am hoping that everyone has a chance to read and review Sections >> 1 through 6 (the first ~20 pages). I have completed my own review and I >> have found a number of editorial issues that I shall be fixing, but >> nothing huge. In particular: >> >> 1. I'd like to rename "Unsecured Room" to "Unprotected Room" because >> "security" is such a vague concept and because the antonym is "Password >> *Protected* Room". >> >> 2. I'd like to rename Section 5 "Roles, Affiliations, and Privileges" >> and describe roles and affiliations as "shortcuts" to certain bundles of >> privileges. >> >> 3. I think we need examples of error flows in Section 6 (e.g., what does >> the client return if it doesn't support the well-known service discovery >> node "http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#rooms";). >> >> What other issues have you found during your reading of XEP-0045 >> (Sections 1 through 6)? >> >> Peter >> >> [1] http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/muc/2010-January/000067.html >> [2] http://xmpp.org/xsf/teams/techreview/ >> [3] http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html >> >> >> > > > -- > Peter Mount > e: [email protected] > w: http://retep.org > xmpp:[email protected] <xmpp%[email protected]> > MSN: [email protected] > > -- Peter Mount e: [email protected] w: http://retep.org xmpp:[email protected] MSN: [email protected]
