Ok from tonight's commute I've found a few typo's within section 5. When I get home I'll check these against the html version just in case they are a fault in the pdf's:
5.1.1 Role Privileges In the table for 'Send messages to all' the Visitor column has 'No**' however the second line below the table is just marked '*'. The third line is marked '**' when it should be '***' 5.2.1 Affiliation Privileges The same thing, the second note after the table is marked '*' & not '**' Peter -- Peter Mount (from my BlackBerry) e: [email protected] w: http://retep.org m: +44 (0)7838 191423 / +44 (0)7903 155887 Instant Messaging: Contact me directly via Jabber or GoogleTalk at [email protected] or via MSN at [email protected] Alternatively via my BlackBerry at 2542ABDA or via GoogleTalk: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Peter Mount <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:47 To: Multi-User Chat over XMPP<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [MUC] XEP-0045 review, part 1 I'm not 100% certain of these myself so I'm passing these to the list for comments, but so far: Under section 4 - Terminology: 1. Rename "Hidden Room" to "Private Room" - although the room is "Hidden" from view I'm thinking along the lines of Private being the antonym of Public 2: Similarly "Temporary Room" and "Transient Room" - although I suppose it depends on it's definition and perhaps I'm just thinking along the lines of a transient within certain languages. I'm going to go though sections 5 & 6 again in the morning, but there was something I came up against a few months back with 6.2 Component Discovery which I'm going to double check as well - although it will probably end up being covered at the end under the schema. Peter On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote: > As noted [1] the XSF's new Technical Review Team [2] has decided to kick > off its activities with a review of XEP-0045: Multi-User Chat. [3] This > week I am hoping that everyone has a chance to read and review Sections > 1 through 6 (the first ~20 pages). I have completed my own review and I > have found a number of editorial issues that I shall be fixing, but > nothing huge. In particular: > > 1. I'd like to rename "Unsecured Room" to "Unprotected Room" because > "security" is such a vague concept and because the antonym is "Password > *Protected* Room". > > 2. I'd like to rename Section 5 "Roles, Affiliations, and Privileges" > and describe roles and affiliations as "shortcuts" to certain bundles of > privileges. > > 3. I think we need examples of error flows in Section 6 (e.g., what does > the client return if it doesn't support the well-known service discovery > node "http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#rooms";). > > What other issues have you found during your reading of XEP-0045 > (Sections 1 through 6)? > > Peter > > [1] http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/muc/2010-January/000067.html > [2] http://xmpp.org/xsf/teams/techreview/ > [3] http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html > > > -- Peter Mount e: [email protected] w: http://retep.org xmpp:[email protected] <xmpp%[email protected]> MSN: [email protected]
