On 29 June 2012 23:07, Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org wrote on 29.06.2012 12:19:52: > >> For Uli's merge request, there is only one new UNSUPPORTED: >> >> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation > test >> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread >> simulation test >> >> Log at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7 >> +bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild339- >> ursa4-cortexa9hfr1/ >> (This test is respawned by Michael) >> >> But the case PASS in the original test. >> Log at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7 >> +bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild335- >> ursa5-cortexa9hfr1/ >> >> So I think atomic-other-int.c is not a real regression. > > Yes, this typically indicates a difference in which GDB version > is installed on the test system ...
Let's ignore ursa5 as it's a PandaBoard ES. A recent example is: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa1-cortexa9hfr1/testsuite-diff.txt Different hosts but the same configuration: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114999/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild331-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1/host.txt http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa1-cortexa9hfr1/host.txt as they're siblings. The GDB record in the .log files seems the same except for different addresses. They both finish with: 0x0000866c 6 simulate_thread_fini = 1; 0x0000866e 6 simulate_thread_fini = 1; [Inferior 1 (process 22565) exited normally] but the failing one adds: /cbuild/slaves/ursa1/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simulate-thread/simulate-thread.gdb:11: Error in sourced command file: You can't do that without a process to debug. UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation test Hmm. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
