On 29 June 2012 18:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 29 June 2012 11:00, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 29 June 2012 17:12, Ramana Radhakrishnan >> <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 29 June 2012 07:52, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> Another two cases fail in precise test: >>>> >>>> -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation >>>> test >>>> +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread >>>> simulation test >>>> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread >>>> simulation test >>>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g >>>> thread simulation test >>>> >>>> In previous test, we have >>>> -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g thread >>>> simulation test >>>> +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g >>>> thread simulation test >>> >>> Have you tried looking into the logs. gcc.log.xz and gcc.sum.xz should >>> show what's happening ? Having said that I took a quick look and >>> there's something funny. I don't find an unsupported case in those >>> logs, but the testsuite-diff shows it. I don't fully understand what's >>> going on here. >>> >>> Ramana >> >> For atomic-other-short.c, error is from gdb. Here is the log from gcc.log.xz >> at >> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa1-cortexa9hfr1/ >> >> /cbuild/slaves/ursa1/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simulate-thread/simulate-thread.gdb:11: >> Error in sourced command file:UNSUPPORTED: >> gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation >> test > > Hmmm but it didn't show up in the test log from Uli's merge request > which is where I looked :)
Sorry for misleading. The two new fails are from Michael's merge request. For Uli's merge request, there is only one new UNSUPPORTED: -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test Log at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1/ (This test is respawned by Michael) But the case PASS in the original test. Log at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild335-ursa5-cortexa9hfr1/ So I think atomic-other-int.c is not a real regression. Thanks! -Zhenqiang _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
