Another two cases fail in precise test: -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation test -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation test
In previous test, we have -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g thread simulation test -Zhenqiang On 29 June 2012 11:40, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 29 June 2012 11:28, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 29 June 2012 14:57, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Michael, >>> >>> Lots of fails disappear in the precise repawned tests. But there is a >>> new one which pass in previous test but fail in the new test. >>> >>> ~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-1010826-4.7-p2/+merge/112036 >>> armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1 >>> >>> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation >>> test >>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread >>> simulation test >> >> Not sure there. Ulrich, could that real? > > If you check the log in previous test > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild335-ursa5-cortexa9hfr1/testsuite-diff.txt, > the case is not shown as "UNSUPPORTED". > > So it seams it is a test environment issue. > > Thanks! > -Zhenqiang _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
