Michael, Lots of fails disappear in the precise repawned tests. But there is a new one which pass in previous test but fail in the new test.
~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-1010826-4.7-p2/+merge/112036 armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1 -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test What's about this one? ~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/later-split-symrefs/+merge/112479 armv7l-natty-cbuild339-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1 -PASS: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test +FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test Thanks! -Zhenqiang On 28 June 2012 09:19, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 28 June 2012 05:55, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >> We've had a few testsuite failures recently which were due to the auto >> builder itself. I've started a log at: >> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/CBuild/FailureLog >> >> so we can track the incident rate and see if there's a pattern. >> >> Zhenqiang, if you see an unexpected failure could you respawn the >> build and notify me? > > OK. > > -Zhenqiang _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
