On 29 June 2012 11:28, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 29 June 2012 14:57, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Michael, >> >> Lots of fails disappear in the precise repawned tests. But there is a >> new one which pass in previous test but fail in the new test. >> >> ~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-1010826-4.7-p2/+merge/112036 >> armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1 >> >> -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation >> test >> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread >> simulation test > > Not sure there. Ulrich, could that real?
If you check the log in previous test http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826-4.7-p2/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild335-ursa5-cortexa9hfr1/testsuite-diff.txt, the case is not shown as "UNSUPPORTED". So it seams it is a test environment issue. Thanks! -Zhenqiang _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
