On 29 June 2012 14:57, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: > Michael, > > Lots of fails disappear in the precise repawned tests. But there is a > new one which pass in previous test but fail in the new test. > > ~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-1010826-4.7-p2/+merge/112036 > armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1 > > -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test > +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread > simulation test
Not sure there. Ulrich, could that real? > What's about this one? > ~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/later-split-symrefs/+merge/112479 > armv7l-natty-cbuild339-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1 > > -PASS: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test > +FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test Yip, that's common but undiagnosed. I've added it to the list. > Thanks! > -Zhenqiang > On 28 June 2012 09:19, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 28 June 2012 05:55, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> We've had a few testsuite failures recently which were due to the auto >>> builder itself. I've started a log at: >>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/CBuild/FailureLog >>> >>> so we can track the incident rate and see if there's a pattern. >>> >>> Zhenqiang, if you see an unexpected failure could you respawn the >>> build and notify me? >> >> OK. >> >> -Zhenqiang _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
