Christian,

At no point did I say people can't use labs. The words you quote below are 
taken entirely out of context in this mail. They were in response to a very 
specific issue, not a general state t and certainly not a rule. 

Ross

Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)

On 22 Jun 2011, at 15:29, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote:

>>> Going quiet is the one thing, going dormant the other. With Github
>>> around, we should see if there is really a need for such places like
>>> Labs.
>> 
>> Why?  In other words, what's driving you on this point?  Labs
>> admittedly has a fairly narrow range of useful, a small niche.  There
>> are clearly several folk who see value in that niche.
> 
> Yes. Me too.
> 
>>  You don't.
> 
> That wrong, I like Labs. I just want it to change so it is more useful
> (at least what I think useful means - others have other opinions)
> 
>>  Why is that a problem exactly?
> 
> Please read the related discussion on the mailinglist.
> 
> The original question was, "how to revive labs" to which I responded
> to. In my opinion Labs should a little bit. Otherwise things like
> github or apache-extras are more useful. Or what exactly are the
> reasons why you should go to labs?
> 
>>>> The goal of labs is not to become successful, that you only become when you
>>>> build a community around yourself. Instead, the goal of labs is a place to
>>>> try stuff out, with the full understanding that you might not be 
>>>> successful.
>>>> It's a place to start something.
>>> 
>>> Yeah, but if you do something related to a ASF project you will need
>>> to go to the projects Sandbox.
>> 
>> Unless you're experimenting around a project on which you haven't commit 
>> karma.
> 
> And this is exactly my problem because it is wrong what you said here.
> You cannot go to labs if there is a projects sandbox, even when you
> have Karma. It has been explained to me to go to apache-extras
> instead.
> 
> See: http://s.apache.org/0Hf
> 
> "Labs is a place for experimentation, not a place for developing software
> that is intended to be used."
> 
> With this restriction I only see a few projects who might fit to labs.
> 
> To go into labs, you need to be Apache Committer, have no interest in
> doing releases or build a community and experiment on things which are
> not intended to use or focused by another project.
> 
> Labs 2 should sound like: be an Apache Committer and have no interest
> in community building.
> 
> There was a long discussion around this already. I kindly refer you to
> spot the mailinglist, if you haven't done so.
> 
> Cheers
> Christian
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to