Thanks Graham, I thought I was the only one who felt labs is useful in it's current form.
Ross Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) On 15 Jun 2011, at 10:00, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 Jun 2011, at 10:32 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> I also don't see how following the normal Apache processes for things >> like committers or releases sees Labs "gather a whole raft of rules" >> it looks more like the opposite to me - Labs has come up with a whole >> raft of rules to prevent Labs doing things and thats one of (just one >> of) the reasons people are going elsewhere. >> >> IMHO if the Labs rules were simplified and more innovative or even >> experimental ways were found to fit in with the ASF then that would >> help make it more vibrant. Why not just give it a try! > > I don't follow why people going elsewhere is a problem. > > This is a place where ideas can get started, but it isn't a place where ideas > should be continued. If the lab is successful, it should move to somewhere it > will gain a community, and that isn't labs. > > I see it as entirely fine that labs should go quiet from time to time, and > believe the only thing we really should do in this situation perhaps is > advertise labs more widely. > > Regards, > Graham > -- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
