issues
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] [Feature] Add support for passing extra information with KNNVectorField [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Dynamic pruning with DocValue skipper [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] QueryRescorer should be able to use the original sort on ties [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] IndexOrDocValues query is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Let's explore a machine-learned MergePolicy? [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Add MathUtil#unsignedMin to simplify dividing the doc ID space into windows. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add MathUtil#unsignedMin to simplify dividing the doc ID space into windows. [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Add code comment about use of Collections#synchronizedMap in LRUQueryCache. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add code comment about use of Collections#synchronizedMap in LRUQueryCache. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Add code comment about use of Collections#synchronizedMap in LRUQueryCache. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning with DocValueSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning with DocValueSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning with DocValueSkipper [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Merge CombinedFieldQuery's WeightedDisiWrapper into DisiWrapper. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Merge CombinedFieldQuery's WeightedDisiWrapper into DisiWrapper. [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Merge CombinedFieldQuery's WeightedDisiWrapper into DisiWrapper. [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Can we support vectors to be loaded with direct I/O for full precision re-ranking? [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Can we support vectors to be loaded with direct I/O for full precision re-ranking? [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.1 to 1.29.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.1 to 1.29.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.1 to 1.29.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.1 to 1.29.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.9 to 0.11.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.9 to 0.11.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.9 to 0.11.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene]
via GitHub
[I] Failing test: TestSpellChecking.testGeneratedSuggestions — ComparisonFailure with expected suggestion list [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Failing test: TestSpellChecking.testGeneratedSuggestions — ComparisonFailure with expected suggestion list [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [I] Failing test: TestSpellChecking.testGeneratedSuggestions — ComparisonFailure with expected suggestion list [lucene]
via GitHub
[PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene]
via GitHub
Earlier messages
Later messages