issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds github action to verify changelog entry and set milestone to PRs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enhance DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocIdStream#intoBitset to speed up cache [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support load per-iteration replacement of NamedSPI [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Stop closing index input when loading NRTSuggester [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stop closing index input when loading NRTSuggester [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] knn search - perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] knn search - add tests to perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] knn search - add tests to perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] knn search - add tests to perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] knn search - add tests to perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] knn search - add tests to perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] knn search - add tests to perform exact search when filtering does not return enough results [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Stop cloning index input when loading NRTSuggester [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stop cloning index input when loading NRTSuggester [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use DocIdSetIterator#range for continuous-id BKD leaves [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DocIdSetIterator#range for continuous-id BKD leaves [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Address completion fields testing gap and truly allow loading FST off heap [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement #intoBitset for DocIdSetIterator#all and DocIdSetIterator#range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #intoBitset for DocIdSetIterator#all and DocIdSetIterator#range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #intoBitset for DocIdSetIterator#all and DocIdSetIterator#range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #intoBitset for DocIdSetIterator#all and DocIdSetIterator#range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #intoBitset for DocIdSetIterator#all and DocIdSetIterator#range [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery clips segments by lower and upper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce the number of comparisons when lowerPoint is equal to upperPoint [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
• [jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6809) DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter should respect minSubwordSize also for fragments ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
• Re: [I] DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter should respect minSubwordSize also for fragments [LUCENE-6809] [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Flaky `TestKnnByteVectorQueryMMap.testRandomWithFilter` test failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Flaky `TestKnnByteVectorQueryMMap.testRandomWithFilter` test failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Flaky `TestKnnByteVectorQueryMMap.testRandomWithFilter` test failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Flaky `TestKnnByteVectorQueryMMap.testRandomWithFilter` test failures [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce knn recall test flakiness [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce knn recall test flakiness [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make HNSW merges faster [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make HNSW merges faster [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix nightly test #14260 request all hits (#14263) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix nightly test #14260 request all hits (#14263) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix assert error TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery#testDuelWithStandardDisjunction #14260 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix #14260 assert error TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery#testDuelWithStandardDisjunction [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix #14260 assert error TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery#testDuelWithStandardDisjunction [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestIndexWriterMergePolicy.testStressUpdateSameDocumentWithMergeOnCommit fails on nightly [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSsDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction fails [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Stop asserting on the max number of merged segments in TestTieredMergePolicy#testPartialMerge. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stop asserting on the max number of merged segments in TestTieredMergePolicy#testPartialMerge. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Unit] Increase Dynamic Range Faceting coverage and address edge cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Unit] Increase Dynamic Range Faceting coverage and address edge cases [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use @snippet javadoc tag for snippets [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reuse entry point scores and provide mechanisms to provide scores for directly entry points [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages