issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.37.3 to 4.37.8 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.16.0 to 0.16.4 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.16.0 to 0.16.5 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.16.0 to 0.16.5 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump prek from 0.4.11 to 0.4.14 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump prek from 0.4.11 to 0.5.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.45.1 to 0.45.2 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.45.1 to 0.45.2 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ast-grep-cli from 0.45.1 to 0.45.2 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump typos from 1.48.0 to 1.49.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump typos from 1.48.0 to 1.49.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.101 to 0.103 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.101 to 0.103 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.101 to 0.103 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.1 to 2.10.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.1 to 2.10.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.2.43 to 0.2.60 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump rumdl from 0.2.43 to 0.2.61 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.37.3 to 4.37.8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.37.3 to 4.37.8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.37.3 to 4.37.8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.37.3 to 4.37.8 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ty from 0.0.63 to 0.0.74 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ty from 0.0.63 to 0.0.75 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260724 to 6.0.12.20260815 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260724 to 6.0.12.20260815 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260724 to 6.0.12.20260815 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump zizmor from 1.28.0 to 1.29.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump zizmor from 1.28.0 to 1.29.0 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.7.0 to 9.7.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.7.0 to 9.7.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump gradle-wrapper from 9.7.0 to 9.7.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.6.0 to 6.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.6.0 to 6.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.6.0 to 6.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump net.ltgt.errorprone from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump net.ltgt.errorprone from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump net.ltgt.errorprone from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improvements to the sandboxed de-duplicating vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improvements to the sandboxed de-duplicating vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improvements to the sandboxed de-duplicating vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improvements to the sandboxed de-duplicating vector format [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport "scalar-quantized version of the de-duplicating vector format" to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport "scalar-quantized version of the de-duplicating vector format" to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport "scalar-quantized version of the de-duplicating vector format" to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement Bits#applyMask in bulk for DenseLiveDocs and SparseLiveDocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Bits#applyMask in bulk for DenseLiveDocs and SparseLiveDocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Bits#applyMask in bulk for DenseLiveDocs and SparseLiveDocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement Bits#applyMask in bulk for DenseLiveDocs and SparseLiveDocs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Build infra modernization (backport) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build infra modernization (backport) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build infra modernization (backport) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build infra modernization (backport) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Refactor QueryCache to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport disk merge carry-over behind overlays (#16570) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport disk merge carry-over behind overlays (#16570) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix incorrect pos incr generated by FixedShingleFilter (10x backport … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix incorrect pos incr generated by FixedShingleFilter (10x backport … [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reconnect HNSW nodes on cumulative degree decay during merge-reuse (GITHUB#16552) (#16559) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reconnect HNSW nodes on cumulative degree decay during merge-reuse (GITHUB#16552) (#16559) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build the AcceptDocs bit set from the raw filter iterator [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add note on committing micro-benchmarks to CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add note on committing micro-benchmarks to CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Filtered kNN: accept set built one doc at a time with deletions, cached filter bypassed, every vector scanned for small filters, off-heap lookup per accept test on sparse fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filtered kNN: accept set built one doc at a time with deletions, cached filter bypassed, every vector scanned for small filters, off-heap lookup per accept test on sparse fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filtered kNN: accept set built one doc at a time with deletions, cached filter bypassed, every vector scanned for small filters, off-heap lookup per accept test on sparse fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filtered kNN: accept set built one doc at a time with deletions, cached filter bypassed, every vector scanned for small filters, off-heap lookup per accept test on sparse fields [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add SECURITY.md for Apache Lucene [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert help files to markdown [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add AI policy and link from CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Rewrite full-coverage doc-values range queries to FieldExistsQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite full-coverage doc-values range queries to FieldExistsQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite full-coverage doc-values range queries to FieldExistsQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Allow updating of single valued SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow updating of single valued SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow updating of single valued SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow single-valued updates for SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow single-valued updates for SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow single-valued updates for SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow single-valued updates for SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow single-valued updates for SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow single-valued updates for SortedNumericDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Allow SortedNumericDocValues Updates when field is actually single valued [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow SortedNumericDocValues Updates when update is actually single valued [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow SortedNumericDocValues Updates when update is actually single valued [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed under-reports memory: retained lowerPoint / upperPoint arrays not accounted for [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed under-reports memory: retained lowerPoint / upperPoint arrays not accounted for [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PointInSetQuery#ramBytesUsed under-reports memory: retained lowerPoint / upperPoint arrays not accounted for [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused WeakIdentityMap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused WeakIdentityMap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused WeakIdentityMap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused WeakIdentityMap [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Query#isKnownToMatchAllDocs() to replace == checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Query#isKnownToMatchAllDocs() to replace == checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Query#isKnownToMatchAllDocs() to replace == checks [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix incorrect position increment generated by FixedShingleFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect position increment generated by FixedShingleFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect position increment generated by FixedShingleFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce IndexOrDocValuesQuery DV penalty from 8x to 6x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce IndexOrDocValuesQuery DV penalty from 8x to 6x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce IndexOrDocValuesQuery DV penalty from 8x to 6x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce IndexOrDocValuesQuery DV penalty from 8x to 6x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce IndexOrDocValuesQuery DV penalty from 8x to 6x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't use PointValues stats for doc-values range rewrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't use PointValues stats for doc-values range rewrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't use PointValues stats for doc-values range rewrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't use PointValues stats for doc-values range rewrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't use PointValues stats for doc-values range rewrite [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Separate term bytes pool from postings pool in TermsHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Separate term bytes pool from postings pool in TermsHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Separate term bytes pool from postings pool in TermsHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Separate term bytes pool from postings pool in TermsHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Separate term bytes pool from postings pool in TermsHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Separate term bytes pool from postings pool in TermsHash [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add hadamard rotation to vector fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hadamard rotation to vector fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hadamard rotation to vector fields [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] incorrect results from SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery when using double/float based points+NumericDocValuesField [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ReturnFieldsRetriever: concurrent scatter/gather utility for per-hit return fields [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ReturnFieldsRetriever: concurrent scatter/gather utility for per-hit return fields [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge write more than one segment [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages