issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads#testIOExceptionDuringWriteSegmentWithThreadsOnlyOnce [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestIndexWriterWithThreads#testIOExceptionDuringWriteSegmentWithThreadsOnlyOnce [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery early exit on non-matching segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Rename `mergeThreadCount` in ConcurrentMergeScheduler to avoid clashing with method of the same name [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `mergeThreadCount` is both a variable and a method in the `ConcurrentMergeScheduler` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix HistogramCollector to not create zero-count buckets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HistogramCollector to not create zero-count buckets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HistogramCollector to not create zero-count buckets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HistogramCollector to not create zero-count buckets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HistogramCollector to not create zero-count buckets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HistogramCollector to not create zero-count buckets. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] For hnsw merger, do not pop from empty heap [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Handle NaN results in TestVectorUtilSupport.testBinaryVectors [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] quick exit on filter query matching no docs when rewriting knn query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] quick exit on filter query matching no docs when rewriting knn query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] quick exit on filter query matching no docs when rewriting knn query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] quick exit on filter query matching no docs when rewriting knn query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] quick exit on filter query matching no docs when rewriting knn query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] quick exit on filter query matching no docs when rewriting knn query [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Avoid reload block when seeking backward in SegmentTermsEnum. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reload block when seeking backward in SegmentTermsEnum. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Terminate automaton when it can match all suffixes, and match suffixes directly. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Terminate automaton when it can match all suffixes, and match suffixes directly. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #14410 - Add Anytime Ranking Searching - SLA-constrained ranking With Range Boosting and Dynamic SLA [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support modifying segmentInfos.counter in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] skip keyword in German Normalization Filter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] skip keyword in German Normalization Filter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] skip keyword in German Normalization Filter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] skip keyword in German Normalization Filter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] skip keyword in German Normalization Filter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] skip keyword for GermanNormalizationFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] skip keyword for GermanNormalizationFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] skip keyword for GermanNormalizationFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] skip keyword for GermanNormalizationFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow skip cache factor to be updated dynamically [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Preparing existing profiler for adding concurrent profiling [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use read advice consistently in the knn vector formats [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use read advice consistently in the knn vector formats [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert "gh-12627: HnswGraphBuilder connects disconnected HNSW graph components (#13566)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "gh-12627: HnswGraphBuilder connects disconnected HNSW graph components (#13566)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "gh-12627: HnswGraphBuilder connects disconnected HNSW graph components (#13566)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "gh-12627: HnswGraphBuilder connects disconnected HNSW graph components (#13566)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "gh-12627: HnswGraphBuilder connects disconnected HNSW graph components (#13566)" [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Examine the affects of MADV_RANDOM when MGLRU is enabled in Linux kernel [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] New merging hnsw failures with BP policy [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New merging hnsw failures with BP policy [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New merging hnsw failures with BP policy [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Leverage sparse doc value indexes for range and value facet collection [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Leverage sparse doc value indexes for range and value facet collection [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Leverage sparse doc value indexes for range and value facet collection [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Leverage sparse doc value indexes for range and value facet collection [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Leverage sparse doc value indexes for range and value facet collection [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumericc DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumericc DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumericc DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumeric DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumeric DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumeric DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiRange query for SortedNumeric DocValues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix test delta in minMaxScalarQuantize [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix test delta in minMaxScalarQuantize [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use Arrays.compareUnsigned in IDVersionSegmentTermsEnum and OrdsSegmentTermsEnum. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] New testMinMaxScalarQuantize tests failing repeatably [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New testMinMaxScalarQuantize tests failing repeatably [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New testMinMaxScalarQuantize tests failing repeatably [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Can we use Panama Vector API for quantizing vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we use Panama Vector API for quantizing vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up histogram collection in a similar way as disjunction counts. [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages