issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Remove the old ASF logo. [lucene-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove the old ASF logo. [lucene-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we add a new "BulkScoreVectors" type api to the vector scorer interfaces? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we add a new "BulkScoreVectors" type api to the vector scorer interfaces? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.52.0 to 0.53.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.ben-manes.versions from 0.52.0 to 0.53.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump nl.littlerobots.version-catalog-update from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump nl.littlerobots.version-catalog-update from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement `longValues` for `MultiFieldNormValues` to speedup CombinedQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `longValues` for `MultiFieldNormValues` to speedup CombinedQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `longValues` for `MultiFieldNormValues` to speedup CombinedQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `longValues` for `MultiFieldNormValues` to speedup CombinedQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: tune codeql for java to use default query pack [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: tune codeql for java to use default query pack [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: tune codeql for java to use default query pack [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: tune codeql for java to use default query pack [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: tune codeql for java to use default query pack [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add more JDK providers to the README list [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add more JDK providers to the README list [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clarify error message in BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase and fix resource leak in existence check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clarify error message in BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase and fix resource leak in existence check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clarify error message in BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase and fix resource leak in existence check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clarify error message in BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase and fix resource leak in existence check [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch jenkins jobs to JDK 25 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Move away from project.javaexec [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move away from project.javaexec [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move away from project.javaexec [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Move away from project.javaexec [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Move away from project.javaexec [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add CodeQL analysis workflow for java, python and github actions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add actionlint and zizmor workflows for linting/scanning actions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Renamed :lucene:build-tools into actual path in the project. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Renamed :lucene:build-tools into actual path in the project. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Rename project paths from :lucene:build-tools to reflect the actual path of these projects [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rename project paths from :lucene:build-tools to reflect the actual path of these projects [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Incorrect size estimation of BooleanQuery in LRUQueryCache causing heap exhaustion [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect size estimation of BooleanQuery in LRUQueryCache causing heap exhaustion [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to Java 25 + Gradle 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Change in behavior using SimpleCollector+TopScoreDocCollector between 10.2 and 10.3 when scoreMode==COMPLETE [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only serialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only serialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only serialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only serialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only deserialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SmartChinese to only serialize data from classpath with a native array filter applied and never cache dictionaries from custom locations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Port and modernize gradle's changes-to-html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Port and modernize gradle's changes-to-html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Port and modernize gradle's changes-to-html [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused method which does unsafe XML parsing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused method which does unsafe XML parsing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused method which does unsafe XML parsing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestPerFieldDocValuesFormat > testSortedNumericsMultipleValuesVsStoredFields FAILED [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BENCHMARK(benchmark-jmh): Add benchmark for Operations.determinize() [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestMockDirectoryWrapper.testIsLoadedOnSlice failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestMockDirectoryWrapper.testIsLoadedOnSlice failure [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce support for pruning and skipping to FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 25 support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.41.0 to 2.42.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.4 to 3.27.6 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Allow Histogram Collection using PointTree when SortedNumericDocValues is absent [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Efficient iteration over deleted doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Efficient iteration over deleted doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Efficient iteration over deleted doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Efficient iteration over deleted doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Efficient iteration over deleted doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Efficient iteration over deleted doc values [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Take advantage of `DocValuesSkipper` in `NumericLeafComparator` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Take advantage of `DocValuesSkipper` in `NumericLeafComparator` [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Failing test for early termination in DrillSideways [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing test for early termination in DrillSideways [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Switch BpVectorReorderer to use bulk scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch BpVectorReorderer to use bulk scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch BpVectorReorderer to use bulk scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch BpVectorReorderer to use bulk scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Switch BpVectorReorderer to use bulk scoring [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Take advantage of DocValuesSkipper for SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery's count [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: partial cleanups for actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: partial cleanups for actions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: partial cleanups for actions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Try applying bipartite graph reordering to KNN graph node ids [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Try applying bipartite graph reordering to KNN graph node ids [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Try applying bipartite graph reordering to KNN graph node ids [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Tessellator] Fix failure due to hole bridge being coplanar with polygon edge. [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages