issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Added the method `forceMergeBySegmentNames` in IW, which suppor… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Added the method `forceMergeBySegmentNames` in IW, which suppor… [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Advoid the use of ImpactsDISI when no minimum competitive score has been set [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Prevent choosing connection nodes that are already neighbours [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] update privacy policy link [lucene-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] update privacy policy link [lucene-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] update privacy policy link [lucene-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Tool to recover data from .fdt files [LUCENE-4706] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tool to recover data from .fdt files [LUCENE-4706] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tool to recover data from .fdt files [LUCENE-4706] [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert TestManyKnnDocs changes from #14084 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert TestManyKnnDocs changes from #14084 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] gh-14127: remove duplicate neighbors when writing HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] gh-14127: remove duplicate neighbors when writing HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] gh-14127: remove duplicate neighbors when writing HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] gh-14127: remove duplicate neighbors when writing HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] gh-14127: remove duplicate neighbors when writing HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make NativeUnixDirectory pure java now that direct IO is possible [LUCENE-8982] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Replace special-casing of `DocBaseBitSetIterator` with `#intoBitSet`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace special-casing of `DocBaseBitSetIterator` with `#intoBitSet`. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add small bias towards bit set encoding. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add small bias towards bit set encoding. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add small bias towards bit set encoding. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add small bias towards bit set encoding. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Seeding HNSW Search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Seeding HNSW Search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Seeding HNSW Search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix TestBpVectorReorderer#testIndexReorderDense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestBpVectorReorderer#testIndexReorderDense [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix negative cost in LatLonPointDistanceQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix negative cost in some IntersectVisitor implementations after #14138 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestManyKnnDocs is broken [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestManyKnnDocs is broken [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] move MultiLeafKnnCollector to decorator and remove unnecessary code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] move MultiLeafKnnCollector to decorator and remove unnecessary code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] move MultiLeafKnnCollector to decorator and remove unnecessary code [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] LUCENE-10396: Add capability to jump to the next document with different ord in SortedDocValues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix `TestFeatureField.testStoreTermVectors` failure. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `TestFeatureField.testStoreTermVectors` failure. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] ASF Jenkins occasionally fails with: error: unable to read sha1 file of ... [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ASF Jenkins occasionally fails with: error: unable to read sha1 file of ... [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] remove refs to people.apache.org/home.apache.org in build [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] :lucene:benchmark:getGeoNames github job fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] :lucene:benchmark:getGeoNames github job fails [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestBpVectorReorderer.testIndexReorderDense failure in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestBpVectorReorderer.testIndexReorderDense failure in CI [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix `BitSetIterator` to correctly honor the contract of `DocIdSetIterator#intoBitSet`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `BitSetIterator` to correctly honor the contract of `DocIdSetIterator#intoBitSet`. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IntersectVisitor#visit(IntsRef) whenever it makes sense [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Incomplete Javadoc for DirectoryReader#indexExists [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Publish build scans to develocity.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Exception raised when using FixedShingleFilter with WordDelimiterGraphFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Complete the javadoc for DirectoryReader#indexExists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Complete the javadoc for DirectoryReader#indexExists [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement #intoBitSet on `IntArrayDocIdSet` and `RoaringDocIdSet`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement #intoBitSet on `IntArrayDocIdSet` and `RoaringDocIdSet`. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove `acceptDocs` argument from `DocIdSetIterator#intoBitSet` and introduce `Bits#applyMask`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove `acceptDocs` argument from `DocIdSetIterator#intoBitSet` and introduce `Bits#applyMask`. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Explore within-block skipping for postings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore within-block skipping for postings [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Encode dense blocks of postings as bit sets. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Improve set deletions percentage javadoc [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve set deletions percentage javadoc [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve set deletions percentage javadoc [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages