issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a bulk scoring interface to RandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding profiling support for concurrent segment search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move finishMerge to a finally block so it always runs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Utilize docIDRunEnd on ReqExclBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize docIDRunEnd on ReqExclBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize docIDRunEnd on ReqExclBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery.testAdvance failire [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tessellator should fail if it cannot process a hole [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Swap out some functional interfaces for existing parameterized interfaces [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ThreadPoolExecutor without NamedThreadFactory to forbidden-apis [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ThreadPoolExecutor without NamedThreadFactory to forbidden-apis [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] CachedExecutor thread pool leaking [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CachedExecutor thread pool leaking [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Further improve filtering by score. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(nori): add metadata support to Korean tokenizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(nori): add metadata support to Korean tokenizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(nori): add metadata support to Korean tokenizer [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up conjunctive queries that need scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up conjunctive queries that need scores. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Brings back `Scorer#applyAsRequiredClause` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Monitor backwards incompat fix2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Monitor Stop Relying on Hashcode Across JVMs Fix 2 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ecj: enable possibleAccidentalBooleanAssignment and fix issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ecj: enable possibleAccidentalBooleanAssignment and fix issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ecj: enable possibleAccidentalBooleanAssignment and fix issues [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Utilize `docIdRunEnd` on `ReqExclBulkScorer` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ecj: enable redundantSpecificationOfTypeArguments and fix issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ecj: enable redundantSpecificationOfTypeArguments and fix issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ecj: enable redundantSpecificationOfTypeArguments and fix issues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler: A Global Bandwidth-Limiting MergeScheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Draft] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] backport optimistic knn query execution to 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] backport optimistic knn query execution to 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] backport optimistic knn query execution to 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] backport optimistic knn query execution to 10x [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reuse BitSet when there are deleted documents in the index instead of creating new BitSet [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use SPI instead of Enum for VectorSimilarityFunctions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove patching for doc blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove patching for doc blocks. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add memory usage check while constructing `OrdinalMap` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add memory usage check while constructing `OrdinalMap` [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages