issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Load dense filters into bitset in MaxScoreBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Increase the number of dims for KNN vectors to 2048 [LUCENE-10471] [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat byte vectors support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FaissKnnVectorsFormat COSINE similarity support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove redundant final modifiers. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove redundant final modifiers [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add FlatFieldVectorsWriter#asKnnVectorValues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add FlatFieldVectorsWriter#asKnnVectorValues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve cost estimation in SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery when using DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getSumDocFreq and LeafReader#getSumTotalTermFreq signatures [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getDocCount signature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#terms signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#terms signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#terms signature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getPointValues signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getPointValues signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from LeafReader#getPointValues signature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Modernize collection#to array calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Modernize collection#toArray calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Modernize collection#toArray calls [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-7 to 1.5.7-8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-7 to 1.5.7-8 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an (optional) field-writer creation strategy to `Lucene99FlatVectorsWriter` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Remove declared IOException in LeafReader methods that should not be doing I/O [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove declared IOException in LeafReader methods that should not be doing I/O [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ArrayTermInSetQuery to sandbox/ along with a JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport 10x] Add SIMD-accelerated bulk range evaluation for dense numeric doc values [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression in BooleanQuery with multiple MUST_NOT clauses on interleaved posting lists [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Defer Sorter.DocMap packing until after flush [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Defer Sorter.DocMap packing until after flush [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Defer Sorter.DocMap packing until after flush [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove the scorer on FlatVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove the scorer on FlatVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Join post-HNSW block rescore for diversifying child KNN (POC) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid double-counting Automaton in CompiledAutomaton.ramBytesUsed [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize StoredFields merge strategy based on chunk deletion ratio [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestPerFieldDocValuesFormat.testThreads2 fails with java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Introduce a `pread` Directory based on Panama-FFI ? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Specify the field name when getting the FlatVectorsScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specify the field name when getting the FlatVectorsScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate `getCollectors()` from `TopFieldCollectorManager` [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages