issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Use IntArrayList/IntHashSet to replace usages of List/Set of Integer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use IntArrayList/IntHashSet to replace usages of List/Set of Integer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use IntArrayList/IntHashSet to replace usages of List/Set of Integer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use IntArrayList/IntHashSet to replace usages of List/Set of Integer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add prefetching for terms dict in doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add prefetching for terms dict in doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add prefetching for terms dict in doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add prefetching for terms dict in doc values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add prefetching for terms dict in doc values [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement `ConstantScoreScorer#nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize filtered kNN search with FixedBitSet intersections [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix map size in CustomAnalyzer#paramsToMap. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix map size in CustomAnalyzer#paramsToMap. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix map size in CustomAnalyzer#paramsToMap. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Why doesn't RRF handle tied scores with equal ranking instead of using positional ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin from 2.2.1 to 2.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.gradle.common-custom-user-data-gradle-plugin from 2.2.1 to 2.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.2.1.202505142326-r to 7.3.0.202506031305-r [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.2.1.202505142326-r to 7.3.0.202506031305-r [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.owasp.dependencycheck from 12.1.1 to 12.1.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.owasp.dependencycheck from 12.1.1 to 12.1.2 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Bug] Stored fields force merge regression between Lucene 9.12 and Lucene 10.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fail spotless check for wildcard imports [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fail spotless check for wildcard imports [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve hnsw on heap ram est [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build refactoring and cleanups (moving from build scripts to convention plugins) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we spending too much CPU in HNSW `ramBytesUsed`, and clearing bitsets? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add non-committer activity to activity report [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] Add support for passing extra information with KNNVectorField [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert more PriorityQueues to use Comparator [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bitbucket download gone for nori (mecab-ko-dic-2.1.1-20180720) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Dynamic pruning with DocValue skipper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] QueryRescorer should be able to use the original sort on ties [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] IndexOrDocValues query is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Let's explore a machine-learned MergePolicy? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages