Filed as https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70272
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM > From: "Cédric CARRÉE" <c...@bespoon.com> > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names > > On 30/08/2018 09:14, Tomasz Siekierda wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > >>> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more > >>> uniform kit name structure. > > +1 > > > > I'd also suggest keeping these names as consise as possible. For > > example, I don't see a need to keep "Qt" in kit name... I know it is > > Qt, no need to mention that. So "5.10.1 Desktop MinGW" should be > > enough. > +1 for a more uniform kit name structure. > However, I disagree to remove mention to "Qt". > I do use QtCreator to edit code which is not Qt code. QtCreator is a > very good IDE. I created my own custom kit for that. Thus I want to > easily identify kits which are Qt related from kits which are not. > > Anyway, as Christian Gagneraud said, it will be hard to get a solution > that will fit everyone. > > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > > -- > Cédric CARRÉE > Développeur Logiciel - BeSpoon > > Tel: +33 4 58 82 88 88 > web: www.bespoon.com > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
