Am 30.08.18 um 09:14 schrieb Tomasz Siekierda: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote: >>> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more >>> uniform kit name structure. > +1 > > I'd also suggest keeping these names as consise as possible. For > example, I don't see a need to keep "Qt" in kit name... I know it is > Qt, no need to mention that. So "5.10.1 Desktop MinGW" should be > enough. > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
+1 ekke _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
