On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Siekierda <sierd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
>> > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more 
>> > uniform kit name structure.
>>
>
> +1
>
> I'd also suggest keeping these names as consise as possible. For
> example, I don't see a need to keep "Qt" in kit name... I know it is
> Qt, no need to mention that. So "5.10.1 Desktop MinGW" should be
> enough.

Jason, it's a very good idea.
Tomacz, this is a helpful as well.

+2

Thanks.

Kind regards,
Robert
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to