On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform > kit name structure.
This has irked me for a while, too. > > I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop Qt > 5.10.1 for iOS Qt 5.10.1 for iOS > Simulator > > Instead I currently see: Android for armabi-v7a (GC... Qt5.10.1..) Desktop > Qt 5.10.1 clang ... Qt 5.10.1 > for iOS > > Either iOS has to come first, or Android, Desktop, have to come last. I think > for readability (and > sorting) it should be <Qt version> / <Platform> / <Sub platform> > > Where subplatform is Simulator, or CPU architecture This way, all Qt > platforms of the same version would > be grouped together. Since I regard (and I think others) Qt version as the > first logical grouping rather > than platform (who wants to select Platform, then Qt Version?, maybe if > enough people want it, make it > dynamic?) Adding uo/down buttons to change the order should be possible. Fancy creating a bug report? I am sure the default assignee for the component will be happy to re-assign the issue to me ;-} Andre' _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
