+1 > On Aug 29, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Artem Sidyakin <artem.sidya...@qt.io> wrote: > > As a perfectionist with OCD myself :) I find this point to be more than minor > as it has been bothering me for quite a some time now. > > --- > Artem Sidyakin > >> On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:27, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: >> >> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform >> kit name structure. >> >> I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like >> Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop >> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS >> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator >> >> Instead I currently see: >> Android for armabi-v7a (GC... Qt5.10.1..) >> Desktop Qt 5.10.1 clang ... >> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS >> >> Either iOS has to come first, or Android, Desktop, have to come last. I >> think for readability (and sorting) it should be >> <Qt version> / <Platform> / <Sub platform> >> >> Where subplatform is Simulator, or CPU architecture This way, all Qt >> platforms of the same version would be grouped together. Since I regard (and >> I think others) Qt version as the first logical grouping rather than >> platform (who wants to select Platform, then Qt Version?, maybe if enough >> people want it, make it dynamic?)
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
