As a perfectionist with OCD myself :) I find this point to be more than minor as it has been bothering me for quite a some time now.
--- Artem Sidyakin > On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:27, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform > kit name structure. > > I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like > Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop > Qt 5.10.1 for iOS > Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator > > Instead I currently see: > Android for armabi-v7a (GC... Qt5.10.1..) > Desktop Qt 5.10.1 clang ... > Qt 5.10.1 for iOS > > Either iOS has to come first, or Android, Desktop, have to come last. I think > for readability (and sorting) it should be > <Qt version> / <Platform> / <Sub platform> > > Where subplatform is Simulator, or CPU architecture This way, all Qt > platforms of the same version would be grouped together. Since I regard (and > I think others) Qt version as the first logical grouping rather than platform > (who wants to select Platform, then Qt Version?, maybe if enough people want > it, make it dynamic?) > > Just my quantitative eased $.02<Screen Shot 2018-08-24 at 10.33.50 > AM.png><Screen Shot 2018-08-29 at 12.11.49 > PM.png>_______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
