The policy proposed here, IMO, is not about silencing the fact, but about avoiding exclusive expression.
However, I may consider developing different recommendations rather than adding "original"—perhaps "We're Apache Foo experts, contributing back and evolving with the upstream." IIUC people call themselves as "the (original) creator" to imply that they are Apache Foo experts .. Best, tison. tison <wander4...@gmail.com> 于2025年3月25日周二 20:58写道： > > I agree with Julian's word and would like to share a previous thread > [1]: A page telling the project history would be better than "I'm an > original creator of Apache Foo" > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b0ygk9y38t8yyfhz7sfpo0yh0xbfhk7s > > I respect people who contribute and dedicate a lot to the project > while trying to apply a guideline: recognizing someone as the > "@author" often creates an invisible bar - it is THEIR project, not > OURS. > > We already have an M&P policy to guide the usage of this kind of term > and it should work. > > Best, > tison. > > <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2025年3月25日周二 18:42写道： > > > > Hi, > > > > As Paul said, the current M&P policy asks to use “original owner” rather > > than “owner”. The current suggested changes would only allow this for two > > years after becoming a top-level project, after which “owner” current or > > otherwise, could not be able to be used, but this is still a work in > > progress. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
