Hi Steven,

Steven wrote:

Also as part of this exercise, I tried to "survey the current landscape", looking at similar projects, other open source efforts. This led me to

developer.gnome.org <http://developer.gnome.org>
developer.apple.com <http://developer.apple.com>
developer.redhat.com <http://developer.redhat.com>
developer.ibm.com <http://developer.ibm.com>
developer.microsoft.com
develop.kde.org
gtk.org

a comment on this would be that I don't see these as similar projects, but sites of multi-million dollar companies with very diversified products or large project backed by big companies.

We are not such, nor we compare directly with "gtk", but somehow a mix between gtk and gnome.

Just as an exercise I went to a couple of other projects.

https://www.msys2.org : just a "dev" section, everything is quite techincal and textual, as expected from such a project. However there are many first top-level directories for organization. Interesting.

http://x.cygwin.com/ : different project from the above, but somehow cousin. Again just a crude "devel" subdirectory. Not a very nice design, but  quite structured. Screenshots.

https://xfce.org/ : no specific "developer" subdomain either. Very busy look, I would not like something like that. Yet still easy at the top-level: docs, wiki, archive...

https://wxwidgets.org/ : no specific developer subdomain either.
Interesting layout although i don't like the "style sheet". I consider the project similar to ours in many aspects and even the organization is similar.
Wiki, forums, documentation, developer section.

I don't like it looks but it has interesting points.

Taking the time to check these out gave me feed for thought.

Also, clicking around other suffer from similar issues we have. Check for projects used list...a nd links are dead & obsolete or things like that.


A big difference is the homepage: it can be either a presentation of the project (explanation, terms, screenshots...) or something which instead acts more as a navigation guide with quick links to parts of the site which may have also menu points or a longer navigation to get to it.

We have more the former style (a bit like xfce). In the past it was even worse, with people continuing to add things, in the urge to "explain everything at the first glance". We tried to combine both the urge "it must be immediately write/show  XXX" as "immediatley one click to YYY".
We need something more relaxed and balanced, in my opinion.

have a nice evening,

Riccardo

  • ... Ethan C
  • ... Ethan C
  • ... Luke Lollard via Discussion list for the GNUstep programming environment
    • ... Steven
    • ... Riccardo Mottola
      • ... Steven
        • ... Riccardo Mottola
          • ... Gregory Casamento
            • ... Gregory Casamento
              • ... Daniel Boyd
              • ... Riccardo Mottola
              • ... Gregory Casamento
              • ... Luke Lollard via Discussion list for the GNUstep programming environment
              • ... Gregory Casamento
              • ... Gregory Casamento
              • ... Joseph Maloney via Discussion list for the GNUstep programming environment
              • ... Steven

Reply via email to