dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Setting your commit email address Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Setting your commit email address Mark Hanson
  • Re: Setting your commit email address Kirk Lund
  • Re: Setting your commit email address Owen Nichols
  • Re: Setting your commit email address Kirk Lund
  • Re: Setting your commit email address Jacob Barrett
• [PROPOSAL] backport PR #5250 to support/1.13 Bruce Schuchardt
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] backport PR #5250 to support/1.13 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport PR #5250 to support/1.13 Jianxia Chen
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport PR #5250 to support/1.13 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport PR #5250 to support/1.13 Dave Barnes
• Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Anthony Baker
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jakov Varenina
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jinmei Liao
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jakov Varenina
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Anthony Baker
  • Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization Jacob Barrett
• Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Mark Hanson
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Owen Nichols
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Kirk Lund
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Mark Hanson
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Owen Nichols
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Jinmei Liao
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Joris Melchior
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Dave Barnes
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Mark Hanson
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Dave Barnes
  • Re: Refactor to Restore Redundancy Command for 1.13? Donal Evans
• Reviewers for GEODE-8231: C++ native client keeps trying to connect to down cache server hosting a partitioned region Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Reviewers for GEODE-8231: C++ native client keeps trying to connect to down cache server hosting a partitioned region Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Reviewers for GEODE-8231: C++ native client keeps trying to connect to down cache server hosting a partitioned region Mike Martell
• [PROPOSAL] increase AcceptanceTest timeout Kirk Lund
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] increase AcceptanceTest timeout Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] increase AcceptanceTest timeout Kirk Lund
• [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8238 to support/1.13 Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8238 to support/1.13 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8238 to support/1.13 Eric Shu
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8238 to support/1.13 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8238 to support/1.13 Dave Barnes
• New launcher acceptance tests Kirk Lund
• [INFO] Distributed Test runs in bulk results. Mark Hanson
  • RE: [INFO] Distributed Test runs in bulk results. Alberto Bustamante Reyes
  • Re: [INFO] Distributed Test runs in bulk results. Anthony Baker
• Commit revert etiquette Jens Deppe
• [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Udo Kohlmeyer
  • RE: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Joris Melchior
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Ju@N
  • [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Donal Evans
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Joris Melchior
  • RE: [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Dave Barnes
• Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Alberto Gomez
  • Odg: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Mario Ivanac
  • Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Ernie Burghardt
  • Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Bill Burcham
  • Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12 Bill Burcham
• geode-assembly fails with SIGABRT Kirk Lund
  • Re: geode-assembly fails with SIGABRT Bill Burcham
• Is "java" available to acceptanceTests? Kirk Lund
  • Re: Is "java" available to acceptanceTests? Kirk Lund
  • Re: Is "java" available to acceptanceTests? Robert Houghton
  • Re: Is "java" available to acceptanceTests? Kirk Lund
• Fixed: apache/geode-native#2465 (develop - 206c43e) Travis CI
• Errored: apache/geode-native#2461 (wip/cmake-3.16 - c26b037) Travis CI
• Broken: apache/geode-native#2456 (develop - 1400f50) Travis CI
• [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Kirk Lund
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Alexander Murmann
  • RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Mark Hanson
  • RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jacob Barrett
  • RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Xiaojian Zhou
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Dave Barnes
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jianxia Chen
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Michael Oleske
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jacob Barrett
  • RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Ernie Burghardt
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Joris Melchior
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Aaron Lindsey
  • RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Mark Hanson
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jianxia Chen
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Owen Nichols
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches Blake Bender
• Native client - PdxType change in "<" operator impacts performance Alberto Bustamante Reyes
• LGTM check failed Mario Kevo
  • Re: LGTM check failed Robert Houghton
• New blog on Spring Security & Geode by Juan Ramos Nabarun Nag
• No more hardcoded region separators! Donal Evans
  • Re: No more hardcoded region separators! Dave Barnes
  • Re: No more hardcoded region separators! Donal Evans
  • Re: No more hardcoded region separators! Murtuza Boxwala
  • Re: No more hardcoded region separators! Donal Evans
• [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe Anthony Baker
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe Jinmei Liao
• Need PR review(s) Kirk Lund
• [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 Joris Melchior
  • Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 Ernie Burghardt
  • Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 Bill Burcham
• [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Eric Shu
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Owen Nichols
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8174 to 1.13 and 1.12 Udo Kohlmeyer
• DiskStoreImpl.waitForBackgroundTasks hang during Cache.close Kirk Lund
• CI concourse checks on a PR not triggered Alberto Gomez
  • Re: CI concourse checks on a PR not triggered Owen Nichols
  • Re: CI concourse checks on a PR not triggered Alberto Gomez
• [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start Alberto Bustamante Reyes
  • RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start Alberto Bustamante Reyes
  • RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start Udo Kohlmeyer
  • RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start Alberto Bustamante Reyes
  • RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start Udo Kohlmeyer
  • RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start Alberto Bustamante Reyes
• [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13 Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13 Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13 Bruce Schuchardt
• Certificate based authorization - CN authorization in jmx Mario Kevo
  • Odg: Certificate based authorization - CN authorization in jmx Mario Kevo
• Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / messages Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / messages Owen Nichols
  • Re: Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / messages Alberto Gomez
• Creating Regions Dynamically 18911098...@163.com
  • Re: Creating Regions Dynamically Ju@N
• Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Owen Nichols
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Anthony Baker
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Ju@N
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Dick Cavender
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Dave Barnes
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Owen Nichols
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167 Udo Kohlmeyer
• [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13 Anthony Baker
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13 Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13 Ju@N
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13 Dave Barnes
• [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Joris Melchior
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Karen Miller
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Dave Barnes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Bring GEODE-8100 to support branches Jinmei Liao
• [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches Jinmei Liao
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches Joris Melchior
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches Dave Barnes
• Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl Ju@N
  • RE: Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl Alberto Bustamante Reyes
  • Re: Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl Ju@N
  • Re: Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl Bruce Schuchardt
• PR to replace every use of hard-coded / character with a constant Donal Evans
• [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Donal Evans
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Donal Evans
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Donal Evans
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Move definition of Region separator character to geode-common Udo Kohlmeyer
• [DISCUSS] enable GitHub PR blocking on API breaking changes Robert Houghton
  • Re: [DISCUSS] enable GitHub PR blocking on API breaking changes Donal Evans

• Earlier messages
• Later messages