+1 ________________________________ From: Patrick Johnson <jpatr...@vmware.com> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 1:31 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> Subject: Re: [Proposal] - RFC etiquette
+1 > On Jul 9, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@vmware.com> wrote: > > Hi there Geode Dev's > > I would like to propose the following changes to the RFC process that we have > in place at the moment. > > 1. All submitted RFC’s will provide a minimum 2 week review period. This is > to allow the community to review the RFC in a reasonable timeframe. If we > rush things, we will miss things. I’d rather have a little more time spent on > the RFC review and getting the approach “correct” than rushing the RFC and > then at a later point in time (either at PR review or worse production issue) > find out that the approach was less than optimal. > 2. Add a new section to the RFC. I would like to propose this section to be > labelled “Use Cases”. In this section I would like all submitters to describe > the use case that this RFC is to fulfill. This would include all possible > combinations (success and failure) and expected outcomes of each. > > I hope with the additions to the RFC process and template we can better round > out each RFC. Causing less delays later in the process and allowing all > community members to actively participate in the review process regardless of > technical skill level. > > Thoughts or comments? > > —Udo
