+1
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there Geode Dev's
>
> I would like to propose the following changes to the RFC process that we have
> in place at the moment.
>
> 1. All submitted RFC’s will provide a minimum 2 week review period. This is
> to allow the community to review the RFC in a reasonable timeframe. If we
> rush things, we will miss things. I’d rather have a little more time spent on
> the RFC review and getting the approach “correct” than rushing the RFC and
> then at a later point in time (either at PR review or worse production issue)
> find out that the approach was less than optimal.
> 2. Add a new section to the RFC. I would like to propose this section to be
> labelled “Use Cases”. In this section I would like all submitters to describe
> the use case that this RFC is to fulfill. This would include all possible
> combinations (success and failure) and expected outcomes of each.
>
> I hope with the additions to the RFC process and template we can better round
> out each RFC. Causing less delays later in the process and allowing all
> community members to actively participate in the review process regardless of
> technical skill level.
>
> Thoughts or comments?
>
> —Udo
