On 10 Mar 2004, S.D.A. wrote: [snip] > > So if they're all the same, why did I get SpamAssassin? Name > > recognition, I guess. > > Actually they're NOT all the same. :) > > Several months ago I read the following article -- it's one of the best > comprehensive analysis I've seen on the subject; > > <http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/> > > To follow-up to my OP, I got rid of SA - My server is only 200MHZ > PentiumPro, so I found SA too expensive. I also got rid of Exim3, > installed Exim4, and am now running spamprobe. It's quick, and for my > needs, I think it will suffice. > > Thanks for all dialogue. Been interesting. > > -- > Steve
Yes, good link. Now that I remember, that was what prompted me to use spamprobe in the first place. To be still more OT, have a look at postfix as an alternative to exim4. I made this change about 3 months ago and find it more compact and easier to administer, at least for a single user. The swap was completely painless, thanks to Debian's excellent packaging system. Anthony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://www.acampbell.org.uk using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
