On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:02:53AM +0000 or thereabouts, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 08 Mar 2004, S.D.A. wrote: > > Howdy folks: > > > > Something that has puzzled me for a bit, and I'd appreciate > > advice/insight. > > > > I have Exim running, with spamc activated via Exim (not procmail). > > > > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that reads > > the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be running > > 'sa-learn' as mail user? > > > > I'm wondering as I've been training SA for some time, and I'm not sure > > it's taking advantage of what's in my ~/Home .spamassassin directory, > > bayes_tok et al. > > > > Thanks. > > Perhaps this is drawing a red herring across the trail, but I can't help > wondering why more people don't use spamprobe in preference to > spamassassin. IME spamprobe is easier to set up and extremely effective. > I see only about 2 or 3 false negatives a day at most and no false > positives at all.
You know, I like spamprobe -- I was using it a year ago, and was quite
fond of it. Does it do a razor lookup now? That's about the only
thing I like about SA -- I'd be happy to ditch SA (it's a resource hog).
Any advice would be appreciated.
--
Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tuesday Mar 09 2004 08:46:01 AM EST
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The computer should be doing the hard work. That's what it's paid to do,
after all.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
