> Perhaps this is drawing a red herring across the trail, but I can't help > wondering why more people don't use spamprobe in preference to > spamassassin. IME spamprobe is easier to set up and extremely effective. > I see only about 2 or 3 false negatives a day at most and no false > positives at all.
I don't know anything about spamprobe. I think one reason people like spamassassin is that it has a mix of heuristic and learning (Bayesian) rules. And you can add your own rules to the list, based on regular expressions. As for the original question, I think the OP would have the same problem with spamprobe as with spamassassin-- it's really an exim problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
