> > I don't know anything about spamprobe. I think one reason people like > > spamassassin is that it has a mix of heuristic and learning (Bayesian) > > rules. And you can add your own rules to the list, based on regular > > expressions. > > Spamprobe is a Bayesian filter too.
Right-- just to say that SpamAssassin has both. Maybe Spamprobe does, too. Honestly, as someone who was looking around a few months ago for a spam filter, I found it pretty hard to tell the difference among them. There are at least a dozen of them, with similar names, and similar features. They all do Bayesian filtering. So I didn't care much; I just grabbed SpamAssassin, and it works fine for me, so I'm done with that problem. So if they're all the same, why did I get SpamAssassin? Name recognition, I guess. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
