On 09 Mar 2004, S.D.A. wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:02:53AM +0000 or thereabouts, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > On 08 Mar 2004, S.D.A. wrote: > > > Howdy folks: > > > > > > Something that has puzzled me for a bit, and I'd appreciate > > > advice/insight. > > > > > > I have Exim running, with spamc activated via Exim (not procmail). > > > > > > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that reads > > > the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be running > > > 'sa-learn' as mail user? > > > > > > I'm wondering as I've been training SA for some time, and I'm not sure > > > it's taking advantage of what's in my ~/Home .spamassassin directory, > > > bayes_tok et al. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Perhaps this is drawing a red herring across the trail, but I can't help > > wondering why more people don't use spamprobe in preference to > > spamassassin. IME spamprobe is easier to set up and extremely effective. > > I see only about 2 or 3 false negatives a day at most and no false > > positives at all. > > You know, I like spamprobe -- I was using it a year ago, and was quite > fond of it. Does it do a razor lookup now? That's about the only > thing I like about SA -- I'd be happy to ditch SA (it's a resource hog). > > Any advice would be appreciated. >
I don't think it does. I know some people are running both apps consecutively but this seems like overkill to me. AC -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://www.acampbell.org.uk using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
