On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:36AM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:19:11PM -0500, S.D.A. wrote: > > I have Exim running, with spamc activated via Exim (not procmail). > > > > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that reads > > the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be running > > 'sa-learn' as mail user? > > Depends on your implementation. If you're set up the way I am[1], > then you run spamassassin's utilities as yourself.
Well like I said, my implemenation WAS running it from Exim. Now I
believe Exim runs as mail-user. So the question was, should sa-learn be
run as that user, when using _my_ implementation.
Anyway, it's all moot, as I'm now using Spamprobe. After training it, I'm
finding it better for _my use_ than SpamAssassin.
BTW, Spamprobe is proven. It's been around for some time, and an added
plus, is it's fast, it's written in C++. On older, slower servers, SA, is
just too resource intensive, being that it's basically perl scripts.
IMO.
--
Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wednesday Mar 10 2004 12:46:01 PM EST
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You can observe a lot just by watching.
-- Yogi Berra
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
